Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

(how about curing all diseases?)

The "Magic" Problem: There is a growing concern that AI may soon produce scientific breakthroughs (like fusion or new drugs) that are incomprehensible to human researchers, making the world feel like it's run by "magic"

Replies

13

Most major diseases we know of *should* be cured by now, but research is wildly inefficient due to "scientists" who one day have an idea and then make it their life's work to discredit anyone who disagrees with it - rather than working the evidence and trying to find better and better models.

Big pharma is no help, but they're not the worst offender here.

Big Slop is worse because if you find evidence that X is causing cancer, the maker of X is going to call you and say "hey hey hey, lets not be too hasty, maybe it's experimental error, maybe you need to look again, you have a nice career and you wouldn't want to throw it all away on what might be a bad result, now would you?"

But I maintain that the worst culprit is dumb scientists.
When's the last time a major scientific consensus was just ... overturned, because someone discovered an experiment that showed it's wrong?

When's the last time they had to go back and re-write text books?

The inventor of freaking handwashing was thrown in a mental institution because MeDiCaL sCiEnTiStS thought rubbing your hands in water is stupid superstition and he needs to STUF. Nothing has really changed since then.

The ONE exception is computer science, and that's because everything is trivially reproduced by ... sending people your code ... so there's just no way that deniers can gain any traction when *everyone* can see what you see.
Lean -> nice, TIL

> we need to model the universe

You notice every time some domain gets formalized in machine processable code, that domain suddenly has a Great Leap Forward? Think about what CAD/CAM has done for manufacturing, and how 3d printing is threatening to upset even that...