Posts
Latest notes
No posts yet.
@Ghislaine Reveling in suffering like this is extremely judaic
@YeetLibs The glory of Rome is eternal
@graf @WandererUber @sickburnbro @matty You yell "Hey retard" in a crowded area and he's one of the guys who turns his head
@graf @WandererUber @sickburnbro @matty I do scroll up, but secretly, so that I can perfectly craft a response that misses the entire point of the thread
@monsterislandcolonizer When your ancestors invent lemons, just forget about their efforts and disregard their contributions to humanity
Was about to make a dirty joke but remembered that I have wholesome followers who don't need to be exposed to that kind of content
@nugger @WandererUber "Hello, atheistcel, I want you to come to Christ."
>"HUH????? YOU WANT TO KILL ME????????"
>"HUH????? YOU WANT TO KILL ME????????"
@flux_the_cat >"Hmmm I think it would be a massive improvement if nothing was ever good and everything sucked" 
@WandererUber @Oughtism Honestly it probably doesn't square, it's a lot of woman logic, but I will try to parse this out in man (reality) terms.
>"women are very confrontational about enforcing what they see as the moral good"
I was trying to say this, but I don't think they see what I called "obnoxious cunt behavior" as "conflict." Like when women hit men; that's not a fight to them, they think they can just do that and it's outrageous if the man ever hits back. I think they take this same approach to their protests; for them it's just a nice outing where they bring guns and get to run people over and interfere with law enforcement, the *real* monsters are the ICE agents who sometimes retaliate. It's not conflict to them until somebody hits back, it's just violence and on some level they accept violence.
>"in a game where it is literally only about following a few rules, they get the rules explained, yet they don't care if someone cheats"
Women don't care about rules, and the extent that they do is the same as the hitting example above: "cheating is fine until somebody gets hurt." They think the point of rules is to prevent people from getting harmed, not about causing justified harm (doesn't exist to them) or for punishing past harms or even just establishing a societal framework. So taking a murderer off the streets harms the murderer which means it's bad; the murder was a long time ago and also abstract to them, they can't care about the people who were hurt in the past or imagine prevented crimes in the future, they just care about the stuff they're seeing right in front of them with no further context. (Obviously not all women are this retarded, just the vast majority)
>"women are very confrontational about enforcing what they see as the moral good"
I was trying to say this, but I don't think they see what I called "obnoxious cunt behavior" as "conflict." Like when women hit men; that's not a fight to them, they think they can just do that and it's outrageous if the man ever hits back. I think they take this same approach to their protests; for them it's just a nice outing where they bring guns and get to run people over and interfere with law enforcement, the *real* monsters are the ICE agents who sometimes retaliate. It's not conflict to them until somebody hits back, it's just violence and on some level they accept violence.
>"in a game where it is literally only about following a few rules, they get the rules explained, yet they don't care if someone cheats"
Women don't care about rules, and the extent that they do is the same as the hitting example above: "cheating is fine until somebody gets hurt." They think the point of rules is to prevent people from getting harmed, not about causing justified harm (doesn't exist to them) or for punishing past harms or even just establishing a societal framework. So taking a murderer off the streets harms the murderer which means it's bad; the murder was a long time ago and also abstract to them, they can't care about the people who were hurt in the past or imagine prevented crimes in the future, they just care about the stuff they're seeing right in front of them with no further context. (Obviously not all women are this retarded, just the vast majority)
@WandererUber @Oughtism >"their norm"
That's what I meant when I said they just enforce the newest thing: what you're describing isn't norms, it's everyone having different opinions. If they were norms there would be consensus and consistency, they wouldn't just change every year with the environment. When the phrase "the new normal" was coined it was because the idea of a new normal was controversial, normal is supposed to be a static bedrock and not something constantly shifting. We live in a time where normal just doesn't exist, they killed it and now they dress up normal's corpse to parade around when they want act like they possess some kind of legitimacy.
That's what I meant when I said they just enforce the newest thing: what you're describing isn't norms, it's everyone having different opinions. If they were norms there would be consensus and consistency, they wouldn't just change every year with the environment. When the phrase "the new normal" was coined it was because the idea of a new normal was controversial, normal is supposed to be a static bedrock and not something constantly shifting. We live in a time where normal just doesn't exist, they killed it and now they dress up normal's corpse to parade around when they want act like they possess some kind of legitimacy.
@WandererUber @Oughtism Actually this puts into perspective a frustrating thing I've noticed about politics involving women (regardless of the issue): they are anti-conflict above nearly any other aspect of any argument. Any escalation to conflict immediately makes the person who escalated wrong in their eyes.
"But don't women often protest and even hit first?" you may ask. That's the stupid thing, they aren't anti-*violence* or being abrasive or causing trouble, they expect to be able to do all of their obnoxious cunt behavior *unopposed.* Their problem is when anyone else does anything about it. Which is why they see illegals as just living their lives while ICE are the aggressors for attempting to do something about the problems they cause. They are essentially against norm enforcement or problem solving that inconveniences absolutely anyone for any reason. This is why they try to frame everything in a way that they're the passive party while their enemies are the aggressors every single time, they don't care what causes the aggression or how justified it might be. Think back to when you were a kid and got in trouble for fighting and the teachers said shit like "I don't care who started it, fighting is wrong."
"But don't women often protest and even hit first?" you may ask. That's the stupid thing, they aren't anti-*violence* or being abrasive or causing trouble, they expect to be able to do all of their obnoxious cunt behavior *unopposed.* Their problem is when anyone else does anything about it. Which is why they see illegals as just living their lives while ICE are the aggressors for attempting to do something about the problems they cause. They are essentially against norm enforcement or problem solving that inconveniences absolutely anyone for any reason. This is why they try to frame everything in a way that they're the passive party while their enemies are the aggressors every single time, they don't care what causes the aggression or how justified it might be. Think back to when you were a kid and got in trouble for fighting and the teachers said shit like "I don't care who started it, fighting is wrong."
@WandererUber @Oughtism Basically, yes; I disagree with the take that women enforce normative behavior.
@WandererUber @Oughtism When you look inside, you see less enforcement of normative behavior and more just constant attempts to deescalate conflict. Women don't really enforce norms, that would require confrontation and also referencing old values. Instead, women avoid confrontation and only refer to the newest thing in terms of what is "normal," which means they're very susceptible to soft power.