Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

2
Flash memory invented in 1984.

This is a great example of a technology with a slow innovation curve, but one that would eventually come to replace a lot of other things.

If you were smart, you would have known that (for example) tape based video cameras were going to be disrupted when flash memory hits enough density.

These things are tricky to think about because in many cases the growth curve is exponential, so something goes from "few kilobyte Nintendo cartridge" to "multi-terabyte SSD on a stick" in the matter of 4 decades.

These things are important to see and keep an eye on, because they are sitting there in plane sight, but most people don't pay attention - and they change how the future will look.

RT: https://mastodon.world/users/labrafa/statuses/116538277647424312
Batteries and solar are two emerging technologies which have exactly this kind of behavior - which is why I'm very bullish on the future of these technologies.

I acknowledge the problems, and particularly that geothermal and nuclear are WAY BETTER from first principles. But the thing is, there's insane amounts of R&D going into solar and batteries, so they're evolving FAST, while nuclear and geothermal have relatively little R&D and so they're stuck in the doldrums (for now).
Which technologies win? The ones that can find a small boring niche and move up the chain from it.

Batteries -> Laptops and Cell Phones -> Cars -> Grid storage -> ???

It was really laptops and cell phones that gave batteries the beach-head to be able to start pushing out from.

Nuclear is an incredible technology, but it's very hard for it to evolve because it's not able to get this beach-head. Nuclear reactors are huge monstrosities which are developed by a few companies and there's very little competition and R&D compared to the cut-throat battery industry where finding a better chemistry is the difference between being King Shit and being Piece of Shit.

Replies

0
No replies yet.