Egregoros

@TrevorGoodchild @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Terry it is intriguing how many of the New Cuck-Right social-media types are emitting their ice-takes in unison: “Chud the Builder is a Low IQ Anti Semite, he deserves to get raped in prison, lol”

morning update from Tel Aviv was clearly definitive on the subject

Terry

@Terry@poa.st remote

the debates getting kinda heated.

I don't get how somehow we shouldn't support him even if we disagree with his tactics. If the DOJ has their way they are gonna nail him to a cross and his family will be persecuted.

Captain Comfy

@Terry @VaxxSabbath @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @TrevorGoodchild The problem is that the case is unwinnable, so supporting it just wastes resources. He should plea out.

If you provoke a confrontation and then shoot the person it isnt legally self defense. Provoking niggers and asking "are you gunna chimp out" shows that getting them on camera being violent was the goal, so shooting them when they do it is attempted murder.

He also shot himself in the process, which means he shoots like a faggot.

Växẍ Säbbäth

@Captain_Wet_Beard @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Terry @TrevorGoodchild all cases are “unwinnable” at certain levels of jewish interference

the question is whether or not niggers get to assault people for hearing words, or for thinking they heard words, or for living in a society where somebody said words one time

and the answer is “no”

the second question is what this case will reveal, both about various people, and about the system as a whole: have we reached Nigger Exhaustion?

Captain Comfy

@VaxxSabbath @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Terry @TrevorGoodchild Assault is when you attack someone unprovoked, and lethal self defense cant be legally used against unarmed assaults anyway. There is no jury which wouldnt convict, even if the shooter was jewish

Växẍ Säbbäth

@Captain_Wet_Beard @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Terry @TrevorGoodchild “words” are not a provocation to assault someone, at least not if they’re not a direct threat

the nigger had the option of 1. not chimping and 2. leaving, neither of which he exercised

decent people, whatever their social habits, are entitled to not be assaulted

Captain Comfy

@VaxxSabbath @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Terry @TrevorGoodchild I already explained the flaw in that but it isnt even relevant, because you cant legally use lethal self defense against an unarmed assault.

Växẍ Säbbäth

@Captain_Wet_Beard @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Terry @TrevorGoodchild as I just replied, that’s bullshit, “unarmed assault” is potentially every bit as dangerous as being assaulted with a weapon

tell me you’ve never been in an actual fight without telling me you’ve never been in an actual fight

Captain Comfy

@TrevorGoodchild@poa.st remote

@VaxxSabbath @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Terry @TrevorGoodchild If you dont want to deal with the legal reality, why don't you get a group together and bust him out of jail?

Trevor Goodchild

Now you're just flailing and soaked in flop sweat. Take the L and walk away. Better yet: put the firearm inside your mouth and not under your chin

Captain Comfy

@James_Dixon@poa.st remote

@TrevorGoodchild @VaxxSabbath @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Terry Im not flailing, you're acting like an emotional woman while I'm explaining the law. If you think the law is all bullshit and we should just be lawless, then go be lawless. Put your money where your mouth is buddy, go help him the lawless way

James_Dixon

> while I'm explaining the law.

Except you're not. If you have a legitimate fear of bodily harm or death, lethal force is lawful. It's called self defense.

Whether the law will be followed in any given area is now debatable.

Captain Comfy

@James_Dixon @TrevorGoodchild @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Terry @VaxxSabbath Actually you need subjective fear and also reasonable fear in the sense that "a reasonable person" would also be in fear of death or serious bodily harm at the time. Case law holds that unarmed confrontation isnt enough if you're standing and not cornered

Växẍ Säbbäth

@Captain_Wet_Beard @James_Dixon @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Terry @TrevorGoodchild

serious bodily harm

yes, and again, people have been known to die from a single punch

how many punches does he have to eat to make it “reasonable” to shoot the assailant?

Captain Comfy

@VaxxSabbath @James_Dixon @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Terry @TrevorGoodchild Been known too isnt enough under the case law, i didnt write it and I dont agree with it but thats how the case will shake out

Växẍ Säbbäth

@Captain_Wet_Beard @James_Dixon @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Terry @TrevorGoodchild paging @Humpleupagus for his legal opinion here - how many punches does somebody have to eat before it becomes “reasonable”?

(surprise for Capn Wet Pants: you can shoot somebody if they TELL YOU they’re going to beat the shit out of you in the right circumstances, while they’re sitting down)

🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘

He's just wrong when he says you can never use lethal force against an unarmed assailant. That's just fucking retarded as fuck, as any reasonable person with an IQ above 80 intuitively understands.

The law never requires you to just "take a beating" because it's just fists. Fists can kill. A reasonable person can use lethal force if they believe death or great bodily injury is imminent. Even an equal match can become a lethal threat through specific situational shifts that cause you to reasonably believe your life is in danger or that you will incur great bodily injury. If you were attacked by multiple unarmed assailants the justification is even easier.

Caleb James DeLisle

That post a few pages up from Captain Bad Takes was pretty impressive.

Usually people - even accidentally - make at least one reasonably point.

Captain Comfy

@cjd @VaxxSabbath @Humpleupagus @James_Dixon @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Terry @TrevorGoodchild My point about him shooting like a faggot definitely stands

🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘

I'd assume he shot himself because they were wrestling over the gun. I dunno. I assume there's security camera video though.

Captain Comfy

@Humpleupagus @VaxxSabbath @cjd @James_Dixon @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @Terry @TrevorGoodchild Hopefully, if we get some video footage it'll clear things up a lot, and footage almost never helps niggers.

🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘

I also assume that if he has good counsel, he'll get all of his previous interactions thrown out as prejudicial. If not, he'll have a good appeal if he's convicted.

Caleb James DeLisle

My personal guess is that the USGOV is going to put their finger on the scale *in his favor*, because as of the past 5 years or so, they have been losing all patience for black community shenanigans...

🐘🐘 Humpleupagus 🐘🐘

What about the "oh shit... they'll burn down the city if we don't convict" factor? He doesn't have the political pull of local PD after they blast some black kid.

Caleb James DeLisle

@pyrate@nicecrew.digital remote

Well, the BLM riots mostly all happened during Trump, they stopped during Biden. I think if Trump didn't want them to happen, he could have rolled in with CIA and stubbed them out.

I'm sure you recall the famous piles of bricks that pop up out of nowhere. Nobody's really figured out where those are coming from, but an Aryan Brotherhood guy got convicted for starting one of the riots.

Okay, story #2: All of these Democrat cities have zero economic activity happening anymore. It's all just SNAP and Bodegas. So lets burn the city, burn the Democratic credibility, "okay we need the the feds to come in and stabilize the place", boom: Robot Dogs and Tasers.

Zee Great Reset

𝔭𝔶𝔯𝔞𝔱𝔢

Yes, global favela before emergent panopticon police state. Within those same liberal cities, people who still cling on to property (for some reason) are adopting South African and Brazilian property defense layers.

multiversal_gangstalker

@multiversal_gangstalker@poa.st remote

south america is a good model for what a lot of kikes want for the united states

bezos or other epstein shabbos goy don't care if everything rots away because they'll have their own private security, their own utilities, and a swarm of desperate slave labor to work with

france is already like this in some ways

"oh the rioters want to burn down their own neighborhoods, let them"

and they just cordon off the area

that sort of plan works fine with people who can't build anything, which is a reason why they want as many white people gone as possible

Caleb James DeLisle

@pyrate@nicecrew.digital remote

> which is a reason why they want as many white people gone as possible

As much as they may hate White men, they will never hate them as much as they hate the prospect of learning Chinese. Because if they have to learn Chinese, it means they lose everything.

It's a negotiation, they'll come back around... We're just sitting on the sidelines like:
> Glad that war in Iran is going well
> You just let us know if you need anything...

And they're watching their position steadily deteriorate but dreading the moment they're gonna have to Say Uncle, because they know our terms are going to suck...

𝔭𝔶𝔯𝔞𝔱𝔢

> And they're watching their position steadily deteriorate but dreading the moment they're gonna have to Say Uncle, because they know our terms are going to suck...

Counterpoint; (((they))) do not care if the situation deteriorates. That's a feature, not a problem. Nothing else matters other than the total and complete destruction of Rome (White people).

Intelligence and management can be outsourced. Raw labor is already a component of the slave class.

The only thing they really need from me or you is the land we sit on, the remaining wealth that we hold and of course our genetics for their experiments.

The quick roll up for the excess of humans is to permit the collapse of infrastructure to allow famine and disease to hold drain the population. That will effect the lions share. Wars will gradually involve more robotics and increasingly robotics on humans; even though King Nigger already started that in the 2000s.

Replying to @pyrate@nicecrew.digital

Caleb James DeLisle

@multiversal_gangstalker@poa.st remote

That theory only works if one cohesive group controls the whole world. It is not so.

The Russian and Chinese oligarchs would be more than happy to depose the western oligarchs and split up their assets. And if the situation deteriorates too much, they will have their chance.

Ergo, it will never be allowed...

Replies

Replying to @cjd@pkteerium.xyz

multiversal_gangstalker

i think china and russia have enough problems in their backyard, i have some doubts about them ever being more than regional players, especially when you consider how much of china's population is getting old and how russia has HIV infection rates on par with african countries

being able to clone up people would be a very neat solution to problems different aristocratic groups have

if you have robotitcs and genetic technology worked out enough, what do you need the peasants for?

Replying to @multiversal_gangstalker@poa.st

𝔭𝔶𝔯𝔞𝔱𝔢

@pyrate@nicecrew.digital remote

First time hearing about the HIV infection rates in Russia, I always thought that was a problem plaguing nations with normalized faggotry; in Russia, it is officially a stigma. So idk.

I agree China is getting older, but they are going to be wise with their population going forward. The throttle point was the one child act, artificially causing a high male to female ratio. What I could see happening is China's population will settle to a more sustainable size after the excess males die off.

It seems cloning has a cap of like 50-60 generations before serious genetic abnormalities appear. Perhaps it's something to deal with straying from God's plan. The remaining throw is if those problems with the technology could be resolved by simulating and updating genetic code preconception.

Replying to @pyrate@nicecrew.digital

Växẍ Säbbäth