Egregoros

Me: What should we do, how are we gonna win?
White Nationalists: we need to take over!
Me: how do we do that? Whats the first step?
White Nationalist: (fedposts)
Me: Ok, I'm being serious here whats the first thing we can do. Whats step 1?
White Nationalist: I don't know, why are you asking me questions? How bout you have kids, incel?
Me: I appreciate the advice but thats a generational life hack and they're bringing in millions to the west every year, we simply can't outbreed infinity third world immigration.
White Nationalist: I don't know. we just have to wait for (goes into detail about Adolf Hitler 2.0 magically appearing out of the ether and telling us what to do and some point in the future)
Me: thats not a strategy, thats a cope.
White Nationalist: What are you some kind of jew?

Meanwhile jews be like: here's how we're gonna subvert the goyim for Fiscal Year 2027. Does anyone have any other questions about addendum 37 B?

This is a great question. In order to develop an answer to it, I think we need to do a SWOT analysis on our position.

Strengths:
1. 99% of the world is aligned with us on major topics
2. Internet censorship is pretty close to impossible
3. Internet is a big surveillance beast that never forgets a fucking thing - this is a MASSIVE problem for our adversaries
4. Adversaries are not smart, they coordinate child rape on gmail, they brag publicly about ousting elected politicians

Weaknesses:
1. The "game" of government which controls all of the world's resources is rigged so our adversaries own and control everything and rule the governments
2. The internet, spy satellites, etc can be leveraged against us
3. Adversaries are masters of infiltration, subversion, and assassination

Opportunities:
1. Build coalitions around ideas that actually cause problems for adversaries but have broad public support
2. Continue to build decentralized social media "machine that never forgets"
3. Use meme warfare to smuggle "illegal thought" into centralized social media spaces
4. Stir controversy in centralized social media - "Elon's Nazi Platform" - drive people to decentralized where we have the advantage "Join Mastodon".

Threats:
1. Centralized "influencers" will be systematically bought out or suppressed
2. Centralized social media can identify our people and isolate them
3. Adversaries MAY use government or mafia/assassins to attack our people

This is getting a little long, so proposals to come in next post...

Okay so specific attack points:

1. The foundation of their power is central banking / money printer, so we always want to be pro-crypto because crypto has a realistic chance of disrupting that power. Particularly we want Bitcoin and Monero. Bitcoin because the biggest and oldest, and Monero because it's anonymous. We do NOT want to favor any crypto that is centrally issued.

2. We know that if we do outreach on centralized social media, we will be talking to bots and/or be banned. This is not worth it. Instead we want to be here, creating regime-undermining memes that other people will enjoy and spread into centralized social media - putting the centralized controllers in a tricky position of deciding how many people they are willing to ban. We need to identify the limits and play with them. If you SLOWLY turn down the volume of the message, the enemy will spend more and more effort to hear it, and eventually the message is gone and they begin to hear whispering in the walls.

3. Then we want to amplify their bad decisions. Every time they take action, we tell everyone that this action is meant to fuck over them, specifically. WRT digital ID, this has been a fabulous success. It was already fairly useless, but now it's also a political lightning rod.

4. We want to make extreme use of Shame against the servants of the establishment. Chad / Gigachad, The Cuck Chair, Wife's Boyfriend, Gay, Bottom, Monkeypox, DEI Hire, NPC. The more true, the better, the more nuanced the better (bypasses peoples' programmed defenses against things like racial slurs).

5. Maintain strategic ambiguity regarding political position. This is also where memes are highly effective because they are divorced from their creator. With memes, we can approach topics one at a time - certain audiences will be receptive to one topic though they are strongly programmed to reject another. It doesn't matter if you pass left or right, as long as the ball is still moving down the field.

6. So many of our people are committing suicide and those suicides are all being wasted. We need to meme against this. When a Muslim commits suicide, he lets the world know what he was upset about - and the world treats Muslims like fucking royalty. The fact that our people are eating sleeping pills or hanging themselves alone in their apartment is a massive culture problem on our side.

7. We need to be building local networks - particularly food coops. This is where strategic ambiguity is a big win. We can approach it from a hippy/local/feel-good perspective, but what we're really doing is building social cohesion. The smartest thing the Freemasons did was to be, officially, Just A Community Volunteer Organization...

8. We need to keep ridiculing our "leaders" because they're invariably undermined.