Egregoros

Godot Engine suffering from lots of "AI slop" code submissions https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/02/godot-engine-suffering-from-lots-of-ai-slop-code-submissions/

#Godot #AI #AIGen #OpenSource

@gamingonlinux@mastodon.social An experience programmer can see if the submission is AI slop within 30 seconds. A simple solution would be to have AI slop submissions be a zero tolerance permanent ban rule from the repository.

@SuperDicq @gamingonlinux @feld you submitted a change to a project using ai, didnt you? how did that go?

@mischievoustomato @gamingonlinux @SuperDicq some people will be able to quickly spot AI-slop

Most people will not be able to spot AI generated code that had the slop-patterns manually removed by the developer submitting it. Because it just looks like normal code.

@feld@friedcheese.us @mischievoustomato@tsundere.love @gamingonlinux@mastodon.social If the developer edited the code that means they probably also caught the bugs which means that the code has at least already been checked by a human so it's probably fine to merge it.

I know it's trendy to have a full anti-LLM policy, but honestly it is impossible to prove if the LLM output is edited by a human.

@feld@friedcheese.us @mischievoustomato@tsundere.love @gamingonlinux@mastodon.social If you generate code with an LLM and then manually edit that also means a non-significant amount of work went into the submission and that the contributor has probably learned something and actually understands what it does.

The whole point of vibe coding is doing as little effort as possible and that's really what you want to prevent.

@feld@friedcheese.us @mischievoustomato@tsundere.love @gamingonlinux@mastodon.social Just to be clear I'm not full dogmatic anti-LLM. I can see that this technology has potential to be useful if used right.

I just really wish people stopped using proprietary LLMs. I personally see no problem with running LLMs locally using free software.

@SuperDicq @gamingonlinux @mischievoustomato

> I personally see no problem with running LLMs locally using free software.

sure that would be great if it was possible, but the size of the models required to get good results are too big to run on consumer hardware right now. We just aren't there yet.

@feld@friedcheese.us @gamingonlinux@mastodon.social @mischievoustomato@tsundere.love Yes indeed. We aren't there yet, especially also in terms of free training datasets and stuff like that. But this day will come and we should strive for this. Only a matter of time.

@SuperDicq @gamingonlinux @mischievoustomato there are advancements coming that will crunch down the required hardware to run a large model too. I've seen one WIP inference engine for this. I have hope.

@feld @gamingonlinux @SuperDicq @mischievoustomato there's also three open weight models now that are frontier level, kimi 2.5, glm-5 and qwen 3.5. they can be run by anyone who has the hardware.

@lain @gamingonlinux @SuperDicq @mischievoustomato can you define what these hardware requirements look like though?

@feld @gamingonlinux @SuperDicq @mischievoustomato two mac studios lol