It's very possible that the original claim about the legos isn't true, it could be a complicated legal issue that the original people don't fully understand or they are misrepresenting the agreement, but the guy is on video saying if he's sued (which is the perfect, appropriate way of resolving this) that he'll just drag it out so long that it won't be worth it anymore. So, regardless of the merits of the original claim, he himself made "doing it the right way" impossible and brought this on himself. the reckless ben guy himself did a bunch of dumb stuff, some of it illegal, which isn't okay, but that is now not the point lol
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
1
🌿 
@sun I've been thinking about this too but there's still the initial video footage, contracts, and original owner of the shop that attested to that.
Of course the original owner and the old man and the ytuber could all be accomplice, but like you pointed out the owner of the shop had all the means to go to court and dragged and used scum method to get to quit.
To add a layer on top of this the corruption of the police in the favor of the corporation violating several local and federal and constitutional laws does not help to not put guilt on them.
>the reckless ben guy himself did a bunch of dumb stuff, some of it illegal
I agree but it was done after more immoral response.
Of course the original owner and the old man and the ytuber could all be accomplice, but like you pointed out the owner of the shop had all the means to go to court and dragged and used scum method to get to quit.
To add a layer on top of this the corruption of the police in the favor of the corporation violating several local and federal and constitutional laws does not help to not put guilt on them.
>the reckless ben guy himself did a bunch of dumb stuff, some of it illegal
I agree but it was done after more immoral response.
Replies
0Fetching replies…