Egregoros

@thatbrickster @teto @f0x It can be decided on a case-by-case basis by a judge and/or jury. Laws can't always be crystal clear because reality is messy.

Interestingly enough, this line of thought is similar to: "There is no absolutely clear line between what makes a person female or male, therefore the distinction is arbitrary and we should not have any policies that depend on making the distinction." Which as you know I also disagree with.

(Examples of the blurriness between female and male in humans: XY CAIS individuals like Eden Atwood who are born with unambiguously female external anatomy despite internal testes; individuals with Swyer syndrome who have XY chromosomes but can go through a successful pregnancy after embryonic transplant because they sometimes have a functional uterus.)

It's literally "anything I don't like is nazism." This is because fascism is local and reformative by definition, and not an exportable political system like communism. Thus, nazism was particularly German. You can't call Franco a nazi or Mussolini either, let alone some random guy 90 years later with political ideas you don't like. It's asinine.

For this reason, any description given will be applicable to any political system anywhere because it attempts to fit normal human behavior with which this fag disagrees into clothing that doesn't fit. It's a strawman.

To put it another way, this guy is for the jailing of his political enemies, which he would undoubtedly say is "nazism", and he is coping.