I'm not against the metric system, but there's limits.
I'm not futzing around with megapascals and newton-meters.
I'm not futzing around with megapascals and newton-meters.
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
3
@cjd "Pound-force" what the quarter pounder with cheese is that
If KG-force existed I'd use it, but newtons? Wtf is a newton? I know what a kilo is because it's a bag of flour, but IDK WTF is a newton.
Mass-force assumes very specific conditions in American Customary Units.
In reality, a pound operating at a distance of one foot does not exert as much force in Fairbanks as it does in Los Angeles.
Newtons, OTOH, are always the same, no handwaving or standard test location required.
In reality, a pound operating at a distance of one foot does not exert as much force in Fairbanks as it does in Los Angeles.
Newtons, OTOH, are always the same, no handwaving or standard test location required.
Replies
1
> In reality, a pound operating at a distance of one foot does not exert as much force in Fairbanks as it does in Los Angeles.
A foot-pound of work is the same because it's based on pound-force which is standardized, not a pound-mass.
It's exactly the same as a newton, except if a newton was defined as "force of 1KG mass at standard gravity". The problem is that 1 newton is nowhere near the force of 1KG so it's impossible to intuitively reason about it.
A foot-pound of work is the same because it's based on pound-force which is standardized, not a pound-mass.
It's exactly the same as a newton, except if a newton was defined as "force of 1KG mass at standard gravity". The problem is that 1 newton is nowhere near the force of 1KG so it's impossible to intuitively reason about it.