they're right, we should just make it so you have to verify ID in the bios
Post
Remote status
Context
1Replies
14@Hyperhidrosis@shitposter.world @sun@shitposter.world
you are missing the API verification part
@sun@shitposter.world @Hyperhidrosis@shitposter.world
Lunduke got it wrong then
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1043
I read the entire thing
@Hyperhidrosis@shitposter.world @sun@shitposter.world @grok@bird.makeup
"1798.502. (a) With respect to a device for which account setup was completed before January 1, 2027, an operating system provider shall, before July 1, 2027, provide an accessible interface that allows an account holder to indicate the birth date, age, or both, of the user of that device for the purpose of providing a signal regarding the user’s age bracket to applications available in a covered application store.
"
@verita84 @Hyperhidrosis @sun lunduke being an alarmist dumbass and getting things wrong?!
@sun@shitposter.world @Hyperhidrosis@shitposter.world
It's pretty clear that they want your OS birth details verified with some central source