Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
17
It's not the only reason, but it has not helped.
@PNS
We are living in the worst possible timeline. Every possible distopia at once.
It's not technology per se, it's technological post-scarcity creating a Rat Utopia scenario.
> I don't like the panopticon, so we need more government intervention.
Yeah, I didn't really listen to his argument that much because it's just hard to take him seriously.
People didn't stop reproducing because they might get recorded when they're dancing at the club.
Ubiquitous recording is about 20 years old and population decline dates back to ~ roughly, WW2
People didn't stop reproducing because they might get recorded when they're dancing at the club.
Ubiquitous recording is about 20 years old and population decline dates back to ~ roughly, WW2
I just hate when every argument ends in...and we need a body to police that.
Besides... meeting women in bars / clubs was historically not held in high regard. Women who frequented such places were viewed as whores. It's really not the best place to look if you want to start a family.
And he knows dating apps are a scam, so don't use them.
The reason he can't meet women is because he externalizes his own failures, and comes across as insecure. Women can smell it. That's not gonna make the pussy squirt.
I've never had a problem, and I'm a manlet.
Besides... meeting women in bars / clubs was historically not held in high regard. Women who frequented such places were viewed as whores. It's really not the best place to look if you want to start a family.
And he knows dating apps are a scam, so don't use them.
The reason he can't meet women is because he externalizes his own failures, and comes across as insecure. Women can smell it. That's not gonna make the pussy squirt.
I've never had a problem, and I'm a manlet.
> and we need a body to police that.
It's the left-wing version of "if only we just got rid of the Jews"... If complex problems had simple solutions, they'd already be solved.
> I've never had a problem, and I'm a manlet.
Well....... I think you're more integrated into Mexican culture, so you're not as aware of what a fuckery it is to be in American White culture. Everything is controlled by HR Girls who reward victimhood - so women like to victimize themselves and make accusations against men. As a result, White men tend to just hide out. The HR Girls are extremely reticent about ever punishing blacks or Mexicans because they're afraid of the consequences. Also, White American women tend to be just completely compromised, and there's no fixing them because they have power via the HR Girls...
It's the left-wing version of "if only we just got rid of the Jews"... If complex problems had simple solutions, they'd already be solved.
> I've never had a problem, and I'm a manlet.
Well....... I think you're more integrated into Mexican culture, so you're not as aware of what a fuckery it is to be in American White culture. Everything is controlled by HR Girls who reward victimhood - so women like to victimize themselves and make accusations against men. As a result, White men tend to just hide out. The HR Girls are extremely reticent about ever punishing blacks or Mexicans because they're afraid of the consequences. Also, White American women tend to be just completely compromised, and there's no fixing them because they have power via the HR Girls...
I'm actually White af. Grew up in Whiteville California with upper middle class kids (friends parents were doctors, dentists, lawyers, pilots, etc).
Of the friends I had that didn't have kids, the number one reason was that the parents in those families put education and career above all else, then boomered them when they went to college, e.g. while they did help, it was minimal subsistence, and most of these kids didn't know how to survive because they were so sheltered. I mean like they couldn't even boil a fucking hotdog because their parents never let them use the stove.
My parents were different. I didn't come from doctors or lawyers, etc. We were rednecks by comparison to the other people in my neighborhood.
Even my career just kinda happened. I woke up one day after college and was like... I think I'll go to law school. It wasn't groomed into it and I was already with my wife long before then.
Tl;dr I knew I wanted a woman. I didn't know much else to be honest.
Of the friends I had that didn't have kids, the number one reason was that the parents in those families put education and career above all else, then boomered them when they went to college, e.g. while they did help, it was minimal subsistence, and most of these kids didn't know how to survive because they were so sheltered. I mean like they couldn't even boil a fucking hotdog because their parents never let them use the stove.
My parents were different. I didn't come from doctors or lawyers, etc. We were rednecks by comparison to the other people in my neighborhood.
Even my career just kinda happened. I woke up one day after college and was like... I think I'll go to law school. It wasn't groomed into it and I was already with my wife long before then.
Tl;dr I knew I wanted a woman. I didn't know much else to be honest.
I think of Spics as White, so long as they’re not beaners.
The Spanish side of my family are White af. My grandma was basically porcelain. My welsh side are the niggers.
My wife's family varies if you go back a few generations, but her direct line is White af too. Her dad is just a spaniard, a very tall spaniard. 6'5". Her brothers too.
I'm actually darker than her because welsh.
My wife's family varies if you go back a few generations, but her direct line is White af too. Her dad is just a spaniard, a very tall spaniard. 6'5". Her brothers too.
I'm actually darker than her because welsh.
Spanish are as white as any other European, they get a bad reputation because they interbred with the natives in territories they conquered.
And culture may be one difference that lead me to find a wife. Spaniards can be very romantic and loyal if treated well. Both men and women.
They can also be easy going if you know what lines not to cross. It hard to piss one off for too long.
I recall one time I was talking to a female second cousin of mine, and she was very much in love, loyal to a fault, was getting married, and getting ready to start a family. Her sister was very much the same. It was quite refreshing to hear given modern women.
The difference may be expectation. They really don't expect much. They live, eat, love, etc. They don't need 6 feet with a 6 figure salary. If you're nice and can house them, and are good in the sack, you could easily get one and have kids. There are a lot around here still.
Note that these are Spanish women, not Mexican etc, so I can't speak to that.
They can also be easy going if you know what lines not to cross. It hard to piss one off for too long.
I recall one time I was talking to a female second cousin of mine, and she was very much in love, loyal to a fault, was getting married, and getting ready to start a family. Her sister was very much the same. It was quite refreshing to hear given modern women.
The difference may be expectation. They really don't expect much. They live, eat, love, etc. They don't need 6 feet with a 6 figure salary. If you're nice and can house them, and are good in the sack, you could easily get one and have kids. There are a lot around here still.
Note that these are Spanish women, not Mexican etc, so I can't speak to that.
That tracks; the stereotypical Latin temperament comes off like “pushy” and “impulsive” to Germanic sensibilities; but individual variance exceeds statistical norms across the board. Choleric extroversion is a valuable contribution to the White Race - even if it’s not my own go-to mode.
To spaniards, anglos come off as too rule oriented. Spaniards tend to be far more situation minded. Rules are merely guidelines to the spic, there's always exceptions, and I mean pretty much always. Rules are therefore more malleable and are tailored to fit the situation.
That's why I spend most of my life being an anti authoritarian lawyer. I hate law, i hate rules, and do a lot of civil defense. People and relationships, community, hand shakes and trust, trump law imo. I know in the end it's a losing battle, but I want to protect what's left of the old ways for as long as I can.
On a side note, divorce is not even a thing on my spanish side. Everyone married once and stayed married for life. It's just what we do.
That's why I spend most of my life being an anti authoritarian lawyer. I hate law, i hate rules, and do a lot of civil defense. People and relationships, community, hand shakes and trust, trump law imo. I know in the end it's a losing battle, but I want to protect what's left of the old ways for as long as I can.
On a side note, divorce is not even a thing on my spanish side. Everyone married once and stayed married for life. It's just what we do.
You're starting to sound like my favorite Florida 3D Printing Gun Rights Lawyer Guy (who hates gun rights lobbying groups)
Gun rights lobbying groups, like medical rights lobbying groups, focus on the wrong arguments and end up creating bodies of law that look like wins, but actually severely limit real change in the long term, e.g. making gun rights about self-defense or hunting / sport is a boon. It allows courts to limit those rights as narrowly as possible in light of argued purposes.
Replies
3
I see the Constitution (especially the bill of rights) as a kind of super-law, which sets the parameters of what can be done with laws.
I see as the fatal flaw of Constitutions, in general, is that they depend entirely upon people in positions of leadership to remain faithful to the principles set forth therein, in order to function meaningfully at all. It can’t really enforce itself.
I'm certainly no legal expert, but I view the flaw in any legal framework in how people see law itself, with regard to whether a law is to be used as a permission or a prohibition regardless of how the law is written. Just look at the 2nd amendment of the US Constitution: many interpret it as permission for citizens to have arms, where others (rightfully) see it as a prohibition of the government from restricting ownership of arms. Spread the misapplication of logic out to the entirety of law and you start running into some super wacky legal interpretations of laws that should never have existed to begin with.