Chemical energy, no engine losses considered...
If that's real, then aviation is about going to get electrified...
CC: @CliffSecord
Signal feed
Post
Remote status
Context
6It’s my understanding that Aluminum-Air battery infrastructure wouldn’t have the same energy density - but would be so much cheaper to manufacture and implement as an exchange network, that it might very well be worth it.
Yeah I’m fuzzy on the specifics - and it was a few years back and I haven’t heard any updates lately. Aluminum oxide is indeed a pain in the ass - which I believe is part of why they pitched it as an exchange because recharging is beyond what consumers can normally be expected to afford.
My dude. If energy density is that high, why doesn't the MIC sell $20,000 hand grenades to the military. Its the ultimate self licking popsicle for clean energy niggas
Replies
1Aluminum, like coal, has a better energy density than C4, but they release their power slowly because they require oxygen from the environment. C4 carries it's own oxygen so it can release it very quickly.
We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Attempting to reconnect