Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

10
"An attack on Kharg Island, however, would provide the media impact Trump is looking for. There would be no threat of FPV drone strikes from the mainland due to the distance, and the island itself is small (21 sq km) with a relatively limited Iranian military presence. "
HOLLY FUCK Does the us actually believe that? The shortest range iranian fpv drone has a range of 40-50kms. It can be launched from the iranian shore and reach every part of the island.
The world doesn't really care, this is because it's not really the customer who pays, it's the producer.

If oil is $100, Europe will buy from whoever is selling at $100. If Saudi wants to sell them oil, and Iran charges a $20 toll, Saudi has to sell at $80 or else their oil is uncompetitive.

Russia -> The only thing they're unhappy about is that oil isn't higher.

China -> Happy enough because Iran will let them pay in CNY, and then turn it around and use it to buy drone engines...

Everyone else? The UN? What does Iran need from anyone? The US and Israel can bomb Tehran to the stone age and there's nothing anyone can do about it. Iranians hiding in the mountains can destroy any ship they want in the Hormuz and there's nothing anyone can do about that either...
Running a toll is actually significantly better for the world than damaging oil infrastructure, because if they damage infra then oil supply is definitively reduced, and that reduction means oil price certainly goes up - which leads to the demand destruction you are referring to.

But a toll does not have that effect at all.

Saudi can pump profitably at $50/barrel. So even if none of this happened, Iran could have imposed a toll of $current_oil_price - 50, and that toll would be paid ENTIRELY by Saudi.

Why? Because offering to sell oil at above market doesn't work. Nobody buys it.

And if Saudi takes the hit, nobody loses except Saudi (and Wall Street)...
Honestly, if Iran runs a toll and then uses the money to buy weapons from China, China is BETTER off than they would be if there was no toll at all.

That's because some % of all the money they have to spend on oil is coming right back to them in purchase orders. And that % of what everyone else in the world spends on oil is as well....

Replies

9
Everything is subject to negotiation of course, but if Iran will just keep the toll money in Chinese banks, the Chinese will be PROUD to pay the full sticker price.

It's about establishing a discount on oil in the gulf, vs. oil on the high seas. The more that discount is, the more toll they can charge.
Honestly, the short term costs of destroying middle eastern oil production is heavily outweighed by the benefits of cutting of the supply of money to the arabic world for just about everyone involved, including the United States. Russia benefits, China has an angle, Iran benefits. Higher gas prices suck, but the USA is production independent at this point, and is now the worlds largest oil exporter, with Russia not far behind. If gas prices get too high stateside, export controls can effectively cap things at a certain point without upsetting the producers too much.

The biggest losers are London, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and a number of American vassals.

The Que Bono calculus here is strange, America's military prestige is taking a major hit, but this whole thing is hugely beneficial to it's industrial-mercantile interests. The oil industry gets a fat margin, the Military-Industrial complex gets a flood of new orders, the AI-Industrial complex gets new demand for spooling up new industrial capacity, and it's so much it's likely to offset the employment destruction that AI will set off.

Tactically, the Iran war is idiocy. Logistically, it's diverting important mercantile flows towards American, Russian, and Chinese producers.

From an American Oil baron's point of view, Iran's threat to cut off the Strait of Hormuz is a "don't throw me into that briar patch" moment. They have been having issues with profitability with oil at 50-60 for so long in the face of cost inflation.
> The biggest losers are London, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and a number of American vassals.

And Wall Street, and the tech bubble.

> America's military prestige is taking a major hit

This is probably the end of Pax Americana, which means the USD reserve system is probably also in a decline that will never turn around.
That's the weird thing, these are things that people of our bent really need to accomplish our objectives, but it's also pissing us off something terrible at the same time.

The USD system is not ours, nor for our (long term/overall) benefit, so seeing it decline is a short term pain/long term gain situation. Wall Street IS the tech bubble, and it's not a bubble yet. I do think Judge is right on this one, we are in another industrial revolution phase change, and the ground is shifting again. That presents opportunity to make new fortunes, and end-run around jewish gatekeeping. It's to our benefit that Wall Street does well with AI, and that we ride that wave to a position of productive capability. That's my current strategy, anyway.