Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Replies

13
@WandererUber @Waldbrand Right, I understand that part, but if money the zoo spends on saving exotic animals is supposedly doomed to fail no matter which animal is chosen, the zoo's base goal of showing visitors exotic animals is still being achieved. Or is your argument that zoos should not exist at all, and their funding should be directed somewhere else entirely? Because I was thinking in a framework of "what should zoos then be doing".
@Jens_Rasmussen @Waldbrand it provides concrete and steel barriers for Jens Rasmussen to be confined inside of so onlookers can watch me douse him with cold water from a hose and feed him the ever same nutrient-poor diet.
Kids love heckling poor chained Jens even though they'll think he's kinda lame. all he does is pace around in circles and bang his head against the wall.

idk what you want me to say here. people like animals and they psyop themselves into thinking that's a good way to experience them and then pay money for the tickets, but it's not and it should be banned.
@WandererUber @Waldbrand Zoos exist to satisfy the white race's inherent curiosity about the world.
In life before internet and earlier before convenient long distance travel, when a European, young or old, would be told about fantastical creatures the description of which could often sound like something out of a fable, there's a good chance that they would wish that they could see such creatures with their own eyes. To fulfill that White Man's Wish zoos came into existence. By spending only a reasonable amount of time and money required to visit a capital city it became possible to satisfy the natural curiosity found in the aryan soul.

There's an argument to made that the need for these institutions has become obsolete with convenient airplane travel, videos and the internet, but the time period where they served a purpose not easily filled by other means was enough for them to become a staple of white culture.
@WandererUber @Waldbrand "Go satisfy your intellectual curiosity" is far from the same as "just to whatever". The former inspires growth and greatness, and the latter inspires substance abuse, crime and decadence.

Asceticism is not particularly white-coded and the immorality of having exotic animals in zoos is debatable, since the immorality of leaving them in an environment that would kill them is also, well, an immorality.

>Yes, and I am making it
Good for you. Me myself, I enjoyed the last time I visited a zoo.
@Jens_Rasmussen @Waldbrand >goalpost move about extinction (nobody said anything even close to this)

>intentionally ignoring the parts he can't argue with

>intellectual curiosity is good even though you can't even see these creatures are suffering when they are right in front of you

L+no respect for natural order+no aesthetic sense (does not value a cats life more than a humans)+hedonist+can't use a computer+stupid+not chivalrous+democracy liker+spiritually brown

I will satisfy my intellectual curiosity about Newtonian mechanics by cracking your skull with my tire iron next time you come to that mall in Vermont