Wanderer atop the sea of clouds or whatever
@WandererUber@poa.st
:sonnenrad: :alert: This is an AZULA SUPREMACY account :A10:
I like classical architecture.
The government pays me to shill solar power.
I'm well aware I have autism please stop telling me like I don't know.
I do not "post", I cast pearls before swine :bigpig:
I like classical architecture.
The government pays me to shill solar power.
I'm well aware I have autism please stop telling me like I don't know.
I do not "post", I cast pearls before swine :bigpig:
Posts
Latest notes
No posts yet.
If you go to my profile and only see vantablack coal, it's because every good post I've made got intercepted by patriot missiles on their way to your computer over the internet. Israel is once again trying to rape me.
@Fash-E @Chzikken_1486 @catmanmancat @WaifuPoaster88 of course he has a picture for that...
@Chzikken_1486 @catmanmancat @Fash-E @WaifuPoaster88 there is enough real stuff to have fun with, and I'll allow it in that case
@Fash-E @WaifuPoaster88 @Chzikken_1486 @catmanmancat I hate you fuckers so much for falling for this fake audio shit
ひげ
Tourists malding over the possibility that Leon married Sherry
@Hyperhidrosis it's only a plus if you need something custom but have no energy/time to make these things yourself. You need taste and skill, but then again with those you can already make great software
@Bernard AI
🌲
@grey I do and this ain't it
Absolutely crazy stuff. Falsifying scientific data should carry the death penalty
Absolutely crazy stuff. Falsifying scientific data should carry the death penalty
@sabex Cool. I tried playing against Grok and other chatbots for a while. What's your setup like?
Age Verification and Age Gating: Resource Hub | Electronic Frontier Foundation
https://www.eff.org/issues/age-verification
> Age verification (or age-gating) laws generally require online services to check, estimate, or verify all users’ ages—often through invasive tools like ID checks, biometric scans, or other dubious “age estimation” methods—before granting them access to certain online content or services. Governments in the U.S. and around the world are increasingly adopting these restrictive measures in the name of protecting children online. But in practice, these systems create dangerous new forms of surveillance, censorship, and exclusion. Technologically, the age verification process can take many forms: collection and analysis of government ID, biometric scans, algorithmic or AI-based behavioral or user monitoring, digital ID, the list goes on. But no matter the method, every system demands users hand over sensitive and immutable personal information that links their offline identity to their online activity. Once that valuable data is collected, it can easily be leaked, hacked, or misused. (Indeed, we’ve already seen several breaches of age verification providers.) EFF has long warned against age-gating the internet. Age verification technology itself is often inaccurate and privacy-invasive. These restrictive mandates strike at the foundation of the free and open internet. They are tools of censorship, used to block people from viewing or sharing information that the government deems “harmful” or “offensive.” And they create surveillance systems that critically undermine online privacy, chill access to vital online communities and resources, and burden the expressive rights of adults and young people alike. EFF.org/Age: A Resource to Empower Users Age-gating mandates are reshaping the internet in ways that are invasive, dangerous, and deeply unnecessary. But users are not powerless! We can challenge these laws, protect our digital rights, and build a safer digital world for all internet users, no matter their ages. This resource hub is here to help—so explore, share, and join us in the fight for a better internet.
https://www.eff.org/issues/age-verification
> Age verification (or age-gating) laws generally require online services to check, estimate, or verify all users’ ages—often through invasive tools like ID checks, biometric scans, or other dubious “age estimation” methods—before granting them access to certain online content or services. Governments in the U.S. and around the world are increasingly adopting these restrictive measures in the name of protecting children online. But in practice, these systems create dangerous new forms of surveillance, censorship, and exclusion. Technologically, the age verification process can take many forms: collection and analysis of government ID, biometric scans, algorithmic or AI-based behavioral or user monitoring, digital ID, the list goes on. But no matter the method, every system demands users hand over sensitive and immutable personal information that links their offline identity to their online activity. Once that valuable data is collected, it can easily be leaked, hacked, or misused. (Indeed, we’ve already seen several breaches of age verification providers.) EFF has long warned against age-gating the internet. Age verification technology itself is often inaccurate and privacy-invasive. These restrictive mandates strike at the foundation of the free and open internet. They are tools of censorship, used to block people from viewing or sharing information that the government deems “harmful” or “offensive.” And they create surveillance systems that critically undermine online privacy, chill access to vital online communities and resources, and burden the expressive rights of adults and young people alike. EFF.org/Age: A Resource to Empower Users Age-gating mandates are reshaping the internet in ways that are invasive, dangerous, and deeply unnecessary. But users are not powerless! We can challenge these laws, protect our digital rights, and build a safer digital world for all internet users, no matter their ages. This resource hub is here to help—so explore, share, and join us in the fight for a better internet.
@nierenstein you can actually do this if you mog
