Egregoros

I figured this out a while ago but didn't realize it was 1:1

that's not 1:1

you know what I'm saying though. But the more I look at it, the more it annoys me for trying to trick me with absolute numbers instead of e.g. % of wealth owned

No. Not only is it literally not 1:1, it's completely bunk because you arbitrarily picked the scales of the two series (wealth vs M2). Divide the scale of M2 by ~3.5 and it'll line up with wealth of the bottom 50% "1:1" instead. Also, M2 is a shitty definition of "the money supply" before online banking.

you're not wrong but you didn't have to be this much of a dickhead about it


alessmussolini88 if you can hear me please save me

@WandererUber @BroDrillard @AidanTTIerian you don't understand, Mike supports MMT. You've fucked up bro, get ready for a hellthread.