why isn't there an F/A-18 overhead 24/7 ready to drop a 2000 pound bomb through the deck of any suspicious ship approaching the island? we have air dominance, right?
Post
Remote status
Context
6why isn't there an F/A-18 overhead 24/7 ready to drop a 2000 pound bomb through the deck of any suspicious ship approaching the island? we have air dominance, right?
Pretty sure even the Pentagon isnt dumb enough to telegraph this so far in advance.
my guess is they're going to try to seize the port of chabahar
That isn't going to be a whole lot easier to do than seizing Kharg Island, just less overtly suicidal, and they'd have to go for a major port area to be able to offload supplies.
I have no doubt the US could achieve a landing somewhere, even if contested and taking serious causalities. My question is how the US plans to hold any landing once achieved.
I'm starting to think the end goal isn't a real victory but a plausibly realistic propaganda one. If you were going for effect, (and you were desperately blackmailed & retarded) then you could plan on seizing some port and bottle up the iranians at some mountainous choke point with air assets.
In the office, everyone can pretend you "only need a few thousand marines" and "you can keep their army contained with 24/7 air strikes". If it works then cool! You have a bartering chip for a fake treaty to retreat with the myth of american power intact.
If it doesn't work....well, a few thousand dead GIs would surely galvanize the public into WWII-level mobilization, no?
Replies
0Fetching replies…