I see fedi has reinvented quote-replies after claiming to hate them by just slapping RE: and a link on them.
For shame.
Post
Remote status
Context
2@kline@mastodon.sdf.org FWIW that's the backwards-compatible view for them, there is some actual values behind the stuff, together with notifications for ppl getting quote-replied
@ignaloidas you might be getting the wrong bit of my message, but fair.
My main point is that for a long time a lot of people (most people?) specifically said they wanted fedi to be a place without some of the toxic features we saw on twitter, of which quote replies were a big part of it.
I'm sad that despite identifying this feature as a bad way to interact in short-form blogging, we have nevertheless implemented and widely adopted it because it gets good "engagement"/modes of posting.
Replies
2@kline@mastodon.sdf.org I don't think that the feature in particular is toxic (tumblr has it and it's fine, very good even), rather the twitter culture used it in a very toxic way.
And like, it's not as if you can't do the dumb shit that led it to being awful on twitter - you certainly can - it's that the moderation on fediverse is miles better and that prevents it from getting out of hand. Misskey and *oma instances have had quote posts for a couple of years now, and I've never noticed/seen complaints about it being a problem.
I don't think quoting is bad. I think sending a notification to the person you're quoting is bad. Notifying them is what's toxic imho. Imagine every time you gossiped about a celebrity with your friends the celebrity got a notification about it lol
And now Mastodon has an official quote feature and you can tag posts as being ineligible for quoting, but that will just cause people to switch to the fedi Re: link version or a screenshot.
You're not gonna stop people doing this. You can only influence the interface design used when they do.