Egregoros

@sun
there's no coherent definition because wave-function collapse as a concept is incoherent, product of mind-projection fallacy (i don't know the state, and therefore it has no state

to be very short, bell's theorem indicates that "locality", the idea of space as smooth-continuous-manifold, is incompatible with quantum phenomena. and, rather than accept that, physicists generally go into denialist handwaving, with their platonic smoothbrane ideals spontaneously changing into disjunct world when "measured", whatever that nonspecifically and self-incompatibly means

p rel is a nice popular-audience book about quantum foundations muddle, though even he doesn't talk this aspect quite directly don't think
Adam Becker - What Is Real.jpg