No one has ever actually explained to me why we should keep teaching cursive any more than we should keep teaching Gregg shorthand
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
6
@RustyCrab there are multiple mechanical and cognitive benefits to caring about handwriting. Faster hand writing, better dexterity, mental clarity, etcetera.
@f0x working on paper is good but I'm not convinced cursive brings enough benefit to keep up the time sink of maintaining it
@RustyCrab @f0x I'm being completely honest when I say it's exactly the reverse for me, writing print is physically painful to me beyond one or two lines
@benis_redux @RustyCrab it's because your ability atrophied, and the answer to poor posture isn't sitting odd, so.. why would abstaining from writing be the answer here?
@f0x @benis_redux I wonder what the tipping point for saving time for me would be because I do work on paper but its more often drawing than writing essays. Would probably take several years to get back the time
Cursive is just formalized handwriting slop. It is designed for the sole purpose of not having to expend the effort of lifting a pen 1mm off the paper between letters, and in the process makes the output completely inscrutable to anyone familiar with only the standard alphabet. Mury Rothbard's last manuscript couldn't be published because he hadn't finished typing it from his chicken-scratch scrawl and nobody else in the world who cares to try could decipher it until some savant (or, who can say, perhaps a charlatan) picked it up a quarter-century later and said he could read it fine. What kind of writing system is that? You've been played for absolute fools.
