Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

25
@NonPlayableClown @sensei @dj @Sternritter-C @s8n @Cozylifer @Wiz

> underage marriage is considered based right?
> That's not considered pedophilia, it's just trolling

I said what I said last time. I have nothing new to say about it.

But hey, s8n is in this thread: he's one of the few people that is still on fedi but actually posted nude preteen girls at me "because it's on Amazon" after spending several days complaining to me about FSE's ban of an account that posted nude preteen girls, and has literally told someone on the openly "MAP/AAM-friendly" server lolison.top to impregnate their "lgf". Was it trolling when he did those things, or was it "based"? Are we going to be consistent about this or what? Is this a "There are no bad tactics, only bad targets" thing? Here's the screenshot of one of those things, I did not take a screenshot of the (again, fully nude, tits out, preteen girls) other post. Like, you care about this, why would it apply to this guy and not s8n?
spag_claims_to_have_14yo_gf.png

Replies

1
>Are we going to be consistent about this or what?

Never was inconsistent on where pedos belong, I'll give you a hint on my forever stance --> :woodchipper:

>why would it apply to this guy and not s8n?

Because I don't follow s8n and vise versa.
s8n doesn't make a billion alts to spout the same pedophile take.
The other retard in this thread has, and not to mention is in your instance too.
At least I can say I don't host s8n. What's your excuse?