@strypey >but enables newbie admins/mods to find and use automated support provided by veterans.
I don't think "veterans" should have a say in moderation of an instance they aren't on. The instance administrator/mod team should do the moderation and that's it. The issue with outsourcing your moderation to someone, like Evan wants, and IFTAS and others are pushing (even Mastodon with its new grant for FASPs and content scanning), is that you have to fully trust those people and keep them constantly in check to not overreach/overreact/get biased etc. To use their favorite word, you need very good governance around those people. Worst of all, IFTAS is completely non-transparent in their moderation aggregation sources, receipts or reasons. They are a black box you either fully trust or don't trust at all. I'm very tempted to set up a throwaway instance just to have a look at their walled of CARIAD thing that requires admin privs to your instance.
>replaced by a standard protocol that keeps moderation decentralised
FIRES is that, but immediately after it released to the public in a usable form, I've already seen what people are interested in it. Namely Oliphant and his island networks (read: isolated echo chambers) project. I would be fine with FASPs and FIRES, if there wasn't such a large opportunity to misuse this for state-level censorship of the network years down the road. Something like Pleroma MRF which can optionally talk to some API server to make decisions, is something very similar in nature, but smaller in scope. It can still be abused, but it doesn't have that large of an impact and certainly not influence when compared to size of Mastodon.
>But from my POV, it equally includes identi-Moonies haranguing me for being a racist just for being in this conversation, or talking to folks from the 'Dark Side' at all.
Yeah that sadly happens and its those tensions and refusal to resolve conflicts I talked about. From experience you cannot be the bridge between the two "sides", it is simply impossible to walk the thin rope. One post with a slightly out of place joke and your efforts are now worthless.
>The video posted elsewhere in this hellthread demonstrates that there is a need for newbies setting up fediverse servers to have a simple way to protect themselves from spammers (including griefers).
There is a lack of documentation on how to host a Fediverse instance in general, which is something I would like to work on eventually. Something like resurrecting
fediverse.express and making it more resource-centered then getting started centered. That said newbies will probably first join an instance and then consider making their own, which makes the moderation/defederation decisions visible to those users (even when Mastodon blocks access to those without an account) besides being able to ask others.
It is a need for sure, but I think there's more important needs than that currently.
>Supporting newbie admins/mods - and especially self-hosters running single-tenant instances - is particularly important if we want a fediverse of many small-to-medium instances.
100% agreed.
>It would be easy to dismiss IFTAS as an attempt to impose BS-style centralised moderation on the fediverse. But I think that's a mistake. They're trying to solve the same problem, yes, but in a much more fediverse-esque way. Using standardised protocol plumbing that admins/mods can opt-in to, unlike the ATmosphere where BS's labeler is imposed on the whole network.
I'm very hesitant with this considering their weird funding through various US and EU government agencies. Considering that Mastodon now received grants to implement these very shortly after they were released to the public, sponsored by some agency you've never heard of which has ties to the German government. It can be an honest and genuine interest in helping the Fediverse, or government-sponsored control of a decentralized network. Which one is it to you, I will leave you to decide:
https://fsebugoutzone.org/objects/55b92e72-d82f-4e9c-a730-34d09d071a99https://fluffytail.org/objects/d89c0322-5c9d-43ae-81bd-b0eadeed6626And now different parts of the same thread:
https://fluffytail.org/objects/dcd4037d-ed55-47d2-8919-ecbeae6b5db9 (Excerpts I took from Jaz's recent blogpost which I recommend to read for more context to this thread and IFTAS in general:
https://jaz.co.uk/2026/03/13/there-are-a-million-fediverses-and-theyre-all-regulated/)
>Have any of you tried the same kind of calm and reasonable discussion we're having here with any of the people you're suspicious of?
https://fluffytail.org/objects/9acf376e-c018-4a6d-baad-154167628cc4 (I and
@silverpill tried two months ago to have a similar conversation with Evan, I ended up getting blocked by Evan. Besides that my account is deactivated on Mastosoc after replying to a post made by Pincus (his Privacy Nexus blog to be precise), which is where most of these people are. cwebber blocked me after making a darker joke about ActivityPub extensibility and rubber law paragraphs a year or more ago which I'm fine with, I can be unhinged at times and was much more in the past. I have alts and now also SH if I really want to insert myself into a discussion, so none of this bothers me.)
>Maybe the same is true for some of the people getting shade cast on them here?
I would certainly want to know that, but so far everyone that is involved in this (Evan) and doesn't block me or this instance already for reasons was very touchy about the subject.
>I mean shit, if we're going to be wary of people for turning up all over the place, I'm suspicious AF!
That's not how this works. You aren't suspicious based on what places you show up, it's the actions and language used that speak to me. Otherwise I would also be suspicious of silverpill which I'm not despite him showing up basically everywhere where there is a discussion about AP. But I get your point, I'm basically a walking red flag to some of these people when I regularly talk to
@p, have fun in hellthreads, shitpost, sometimes talk to Poasties and also join AP/FEP threads when they are interesting.
@icedquinn @fish @Deplorable_Degenerate @sampler @p @silverpill @light @coolboymew