America
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Replies
50
For all California’s bluster, they’ve spent 10s of billions of dollars and laid not a single km of track.
I love when Europeans tell me about trains in California when they've never been on Bart in Oakland. 😒
Trains in Europe worked because they didn't have niggers
And that's why it's not profitable here.
Whenever Europeans ask why Americans don't take public transport, it's like asking why The Emperor's New Suit never gets dirty.
Everybody knows the answer to that question, but nobody is allowed to say it.
Everybody knows the answer to that question, but nobody is allowed to say it.
also pretty sure i've seen plenty of video of the transit in europe being over run by african shit skins who dont follow any basic logic or rules
But euros were pushed onto trains decades ago, so they'll say anything to justify it, since they have no other choice.
Besides the American story is about getting away from niggers. Europe invited them in.
Besides the American story is about getting away from niggers. Europe invited them in.
But why is it terrible?
Who made public transport terrible?
Who made public transport terrible?
> It's underfunded
> We just need more funding
> If we had funding
> One more funding
You a Democrat?
> We just need more funding
> If we had funding
> One more funding
You a Democrat?
Ahh, then you ARE the European asking innocently about the Emperor's Clothes.
@xaetacore @dictatordave you are arguing with poasties, the moment you dare imply any worldly problem is not the result of 100% exclusively nigger-kike-mudslimes-pajeets, but perhaps caused internally by internal factors within the country, they have a meltdown/crashout, because that implies there is something that a) can be done b) was done by their own projected ingroup against their intrest c) life actually can be made better in a topic (which is bad, because then a (rage)-entertainment source will be removed for them. which is irrantional and not true because there is always *next-thing* and there will always be things to hate that can be attached to next-thing)
for a average poastie, implying that a woe is not a kike-plan, is emotionally like killing their dog, mother and father and hypothetical children all at the same time. if you want to post with poasties without them having a crash out, you HAVE to write the correct buzzword to calm their brain like a zoomer needing minecraft videos. you dont even have to incorporate the buzzword logically into the post, it just needs to exist to prove you are enlightened and one of "them", not a "liberal democrat"
ironically, writing anything about trump will split the poasties 50/50 into hating and liking you
for a average poastie, implying that a woe is not a kike-plan, is emotionally like killing their dog, mother and father and hypothetical children all at the same time. if you want to post with poasties without them having a crash out, you HAVE to write the correct buzzword to calm their brain like a zoomer needing minecraft videos. you dont even have to incorporate the buzzword logically into the post, it just needs to exist to prove you are enlightened and one of "them", not a "liberal democrat"
ironically, writing anything about trump will split the poasties 50/50 into hating and liking you
@Humpleupagus @Sergio4ever @rubberducky @dictatordave who needs to get pushed onto more convenient ways of long distance travel??
I bought a car.
And still what am I going to do if I need to this week get to an airport far away. I'm not going to drive there and pay some asshole to park a car there for a week and have it vandalised. Why do that when I can get on a train here and just ride the train directly to the airport.
It's cheaper AND more chill
@xaetacore @cjd
after living with both I personally would prefer cars over public transport. the quality of such is too dependent on location and jurisdiction. Even the most of the places that I have lived realistically cannot support public transport anyway
and it really only works well for large cities anyway, it kinda blows for anything long distance, especially where I have lived most of my life
after living with both I personally would prefer cars over public transport. the quality of such is too dependent on location and jurisdiction. Even the most of the places that I have lived realistically cannot support public transport anyway
and it really only works well for large cities anyway, it kinda blows for anything long distance, especially where I have lived most of my life
@xaetacore @cjd
that and if we got public transport here pretty much only the dregs of society would be using it and id rather not deal with that
that and if we got public transport here pretty much only the dregs of society would be using it and id rather not deal with that
Basically what it comes down to is that there exist on this planet some Featherless Bipeds that have a certain mastery of language, but are manifestly unfit for participation in any kind of advanced civilization.
It's not all dark skinned people, but they generally are dark skinned, and so most people are utterly incapable of acknowledging the fact and would rather create an entire universe in their head just to avoid it.
Fortunately for Europeans, our governments are NOT run by Most People, they understand the situation and are prepared to quietly remove the problem, to be imprisoned or deported or otherwise made no longer a problem.
But in America they are not so lucky, and government - either through bad faith or negligence - forces everybody to live with these monsters. America used to have beautiful urban areas like Detroit, Gary, Saint Louis, and Chicago, but these have all been turned into 3rd world hellscapes with a murder rate as bad as some literal war zones.
So Americans ran away, they ran to rural and suburban areas as far away from the cities as they could. And as a result, there's no sense in building public transport because everyone is so spread out anyway.
It's not all dark skinned people, but they generally are dark skinned, and so most people are utterly incapable of acknowledging the fact and would rather create an entire universe in their head just to avoid it.
Fortunately for Europeans, our governments are NOT run by Most People, they understand the situation and are prepared to quietly remove the problem, to be imprisoned or deported or otherwise made no longer a problem.
But in America they are not so lucky, and government - either through bad faith or negligence - forces everybody to live with these monsters. America used to have beautiful urban areas like Detroit, Gary, Saint Louis, and Chicago, but these have all been turned into 3rd world hellscapes with a murder rate as bad as some literal war zones.
So Americans ran away, they ran to rural and suburban areas as far away from the cities as they could. And as a result, there's no sense in building public transport because everyone is so spread out anyway.
Yup, but unfortunately decent criminal justice is a topic which can't be broached without re-litigating the Civil War...
@cjd @xaetacore we're probably having that fight again soon anyway so no big deal. We already wanted to do that for years
@cjd @xaetacore
>1865 War of Northern Agression ends
>1965 Civil Rights act humiliates Whites
Does anyone understand what's at stake now?
>1865 War of Northern Agression ends
>1965 Civil Rights act humiliates Whites
Does anyone understand what's at stake now?
None of that addresses the basic, fundamental reason why expanding public transportation in America is neither good, nor feasible.
I suspect “silas” here probably feels he risks legal penalties for stating the reason on a public forum; so I’ll interpret silence as agreement 
He convert to Islam, so he can say whatever he wants. 😃
now he can get stoned for free
lol stupid Americans fell for the joke and got triggered 😆
Yes, trains are great when they're not just the nigger delivery service that destroys your community, but in America, that's all they end up being, so yeah, we're not big fans.
Trains and autism name a better power couple
Exactly, it's not like we don't want to love them, and , the technology, the mechanical beauty, yeah, man, right on... but it's what comes inside them thats the problem.
Niggers are precisely why we can’t have nice things. Few situations are more frustrating than problems with super simple solutions that are just barely out of reach, taunting us.
Just let me know if you see someone with a key, because I need some shampoo.
@Humpleupagus @Sergio4ever @rubberducky @BowsacNoodle @HonkHonkBoom @KingOfWhiteAmerica @Yesterday @dictatordave shit I have never seen in Germany
Every store in California. You don't know how bad it really is.
You can literally tell when an Oklahoma town or city has a Black population more than 10-20% by whether or not the local stores do this, and you can get a good estimate by how much they do it.
I've only seen shampoo locked up in OKC.
I've only seen shampoo locked up in OKC.
I don't even go to the store anymore. I just have it delivered. It costs a little more, but it's safer.
If they did that where I live, I'd fucking move.
☦️
@cjd @xaetacore Public transport is amazing, trains will get you places faster and more comfortably than cars ever can. Instead of having the courage to address the nigger problem everyone just switched to cars and created a traffic hellscape.
Public transportation should be the only transportation allowed in society, and if you don't like it change the racial composition.
Public transportation should be the only transportation allowed in society, and if you don't like it change the racial composition.
I live in France, currently a rural area which is 95% white.
Even in Paris though, there is no issue with non-whites that makes public transport BAD. They're polite, quite, etc. French govt does not tolerate animalistic behavior from anyone.
Suffice to say, I'm pretty experienced with public transport - and I still prefer taking the car.
1. No waiting
2. It's not crowded
3. It's never delayed because of some technical problem
4. It goes straight to where I want to be
There's no change of racial composition that will really fix these issues. I think public transport ought to exist as an option, but in any society there are good reasons not to want that option.
Even in Paris though, there is no issue with non-whites that makes public transport BAD. They're polite, quite, etc. French govt does not tolerate animalistic behavior from anyone.
Suffice to say, I'm pretty experienced with public transport - and I still prefer taking the car.
1. No waiting
2. It's not crowded
3. It's never delayed because of some technical problem
4. It goes straight to where I want to be
There's no change of racial composition that will really fix these issues. I think public transport ought to exist as an option, but in any society there are good reasons not to want that option.
@cjd @xaetacore All of your points are purely a policy problem, rail transports cargo faster and cheaper (=less crowded) than road. Secondary transportation like tram can get you to your final destination. Wait times no longer than 5 mins if you do it right.
You can't complain about the crowding and not shitskinning in the same breath, they're the same thing.
You can't complain about the crowding and not shitskinning in the same breath, they're the same thing.
> Secondary transportation like tram can get you to your final destination
Well not to my house, not even a bus makes it this far out.
> Wait times no longer than 5 mins if you do it right.
Well, nobody in the world has really managed to solve that problem. There are places where a train comes every 3 minutes, but that's conditioned on there being a LOT of passengers to use it.
> You can't complain about the crowding and not shitskinning in the same breath, they're the same thing.
Well, no. If they got rid of all the non-whites, that would be less population. Less population means they send less trains because there's less people to ride them. But STILL when a train gets delayed because of some debris on the track or whatever, the platform fills up and then the train is crowded...
Pic: Japan back when they were still zero diversity.
Well not to my house, not even a bus makes it this far out.
> Wait times no longer than 5 mins if you do it right.
Well, nobody in the world has really managed to solve that problem. There are places where a train comes every 3 minutes, but that's conditioned on there being a LOT of passengers to use it.
> You can't complain about the crowding and not shitskinning in the same breath, they're the same thing.
Well, no. If they got rid of all the non-whites, that would be less population. Less population means they send less trains because there's less people to ride them. But STILL when a train gets delayed because of some debris on the track or whatever, the platform fills up and then the train is crowded...
Pic: Japan back when they were still zero diversity.
That looks like a Bombardier Challenger fitted for 1st class airline service.
There's a train from the big town near me to Paris, and it looks close to that nice. It's 40€ one way. It is worth it sometimes because you can relax or work while you're in transit, but taking the Volvo is like 20 in fuel for the round trip, and that carries 4 people...
There's a train from the big town near me to Paris, and it looks close to that nice. It's 40€ one way. It is worth it sometimes because you can relax or work while you're in transit, but taking the Volvo is like 20 in fuel for the round trip, and that carries 4 people...
@cjd @xaetacore Then you can use your car from the station to home. Everything is a question of investment, if you want to pay bottom dollar for your train ticket, and spend thousands of dollars annually on your car naturally the car service will be better. But at equal investment rail beats car by a factor of 3.
And the Japanese are a special case, they have insane population density, and that's how they like it. Besides I wouldn't mind getting stuffed in with some cute girls.
And the Japanese are a special case, they have insane population density, and that's how they like it. Besides I wouldn't mind getting stuffed in with some cute girls.
>a rural area
I don't think all of the points were purely a policy problem, unless you're one of those neoliberals that thinks everyone should live in crowded cities.
I don't think all of the points were purely a policy problem, unless you're one of those neoliberals that thinks everyone should live in crowded cities.
@Deplorable_Degenerate @xaetacore @cjd No I don't think so, but rural places can have trains too if there's incentive to build them. If anything a lack of trains is the reason why more people don't live in the countryside.
So a train station every 500-1000 feet is your ideal world?
Rail is a bit weird, it IS cheaper by the ton for transport of something like coal - but also there's a reason why long haul trucking companies don't go out of business.
In France rail is subsidized, and fuel is heavily taxed ($8 a gallon is the norm), but still it's cheaper in most cases to drive than it is to take a train. If you taking someone with you then it's massively cheaper.
In France rail is subsidized, and fuel is heavily taxed ($8 a gallon is the norm), but still it's cheaper in most cases to drive than it is to take a train. If you taking someone with you then it's massively cheaper.
Naw, just that walking for the last three miles or so anywhere you go should be normal and expected
@cjd @ProfessorBalls @xaetacore And yet the Volvo usually carries 1 person. First class annual ticket costs you as much as a car annually, even cheaper if you're talking about newer cars, and with number of customers the price only goes down. Sit back relax, doze off, read a book, 300km/h, no traffic jams, no parking, you can't beat that.
I think what's realistic is certain roads will only allow cars that can switch into an autonomous mode where they might as well be a train. Then you drive from your house to the autoroute and at that point the car takes over and you read the paper. And the autoroute can be one lane because everything on that road is centrally coordinated.
That takes a hard problem that is very old and converts it into a solvable technological problem.
That takes a hard problem that is very old and converts it into a solvable technological problem.
@Deplorable_Degenerate @xaetacore @cjd Not every 1000 feet since that's not how villages are spaced, but a train station in every village and the entire village within walking distance of it, that would be the ideal world.
1000 feet is pretty much an optimal walking range, any further and it is going to get really hard on the eldery and infirm. This isn't even touching on emergency services, not just medical but fire and police too.
Likewise not everyone lives in or near a village. Rural can have a lot of meanings, my nearest neighbor is about 600 feet away, but there is a small farming community about 1000 feet the opposite direction and several miles away from the nearest proper town.
I've seen homes separated from each other by five or more miles in some areas.
I am not against mass transit in a homogenous society, persay, but complete elimination of the alternative seems a bit much. But at least your response isn't the reddit tier answer of "well all those farmers should live in cities, farming is bad for the environment anyway!"
Likewise not everyone lives in or near a village. Rural can have a lot of meanings, my nearest neighbor is about 600 feet away, but there is a small farming community about 1000 feet the opposite direction and several miles away from the nearest proper town.
I've seen homes separated from each other by five or more miles in some areas.
I am not against mass transit in a homogenous society, persay, but complete elimination of the alternative seems a bit much. But at least your response isn't the reddit tier answer of "well all those farmers should live in cities, farming is bad for the environment anyway!"