why isn't there an F/A-18 overhead 24/7 ready to drop a 2000 pound bomb through the deck of any suspicious ship approaching the island? we have air dominance, right?
Post
Remote status
Context
12why isn't there an F/A-18 overhead 24/7 ready to drop a 2000 pound bomb through the deck of any suspicious ship approaching the island? we have air dominance, right?
Pretty sure even the Pentagon isnt dumb enough to telegraph this so far in advance.
my guess is they're going to try to seize the port of chabahar
That isn't going to be a whole lot easier to do than seizing Kharg Island, just less overtly suicidal, and they'd have to go for a major port area to be able to offload supplies.
I have no doubt the US could achieve a landing somewhere, even if contested and taking serious causalities. My question is how the US plans to hold any landing once achieved.
Amphibious landing that immediately results in urban combat
Unless you can encircle the city. They did that a lot in Iraq.
The Iraqi army was surrendering en-masse to advancing US forces. Nothing about the situation is comparable.
Was made up of gibs from the Soviets and Uncle Sam during the Iran Iraq War.
Iran is a near peer. They haven't faced actual combat yet. Lobbing a bunch of missiles isn't actual war. Maybe they are so focused on rockets that their actual Army is like Pakistans. I know literally nothing about their capabilities. I'm pretty sure we'd fuck up Pakistan or Indian troops. Iran hasnt had a war in 45 years. They have no troops with combat experience.
or iran can simply ignore them and tell us to pull them out or they'll completely destroy the gulf state oil infrastructure and close the strait permanently
I doubt any sort of US force able to land in Iran will be able to bring significant AD assets with them and will be sitting ducks.
Replies
0Fetching replies…