Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

20
"An attack on Kharg Island, however, would provide the media impact Trump is looking for. There would be no threat of FPV drone strikes from the mainland due to the distance, and the island itself is small (21 sq km) with a relatively limited Iranian military presence. "
HOLLY FUCK Does the us actually believe that? The shortest range iranian fpv drone has a range of 40-50kms. It can be launched from the iranian shore and reach every part of the island.
Iran was already giving China a sweetheart deal. As to what can be done about it - at this point, lots of things.

It's obvious that the US can level every inch of Iran's oil production, and they can certainly damage the rest of the persian gulf's oil.

If people believe that Iran is going to do that anyway, they'll end up blaming Iran for a retaliation they do against the US if the US attacks first, which ultimately wouldn't be a good situation for them.

We don't know if it can end it completely, that depends on a lot of factors. Since the intercepts of the Iranian attacks has been not 100, what they have left versus the amount of targets they have matters a lot in terms of that calculation.

Russia is rearming them daily from the Caspian sea with chink stuff. Iran has replanished most of the drones it has used through that route alone (hence the kikes attempting strikes in the Caspian see). Chinks are making drones for them like they're funko pops. They're not running out. Ever. And just the money iran made until it closed tbe straits alongside what Russia made can pay for hundreds of thousands of drones.

Yeah, on Zerohedge some retarded article talked about kikes targeting the "smuggling" route between Russia and Iran at the Caspian.

It's two sovereign nations trading, that's not "smuggling". Of course weapon deliveries to the ukraine are not "smuggling", that's "aid". I hate these word-twisting assholes.
I don't think it's clear at all that this is actually bad strategy. Just like the US, these countries are all made up of a bunch of different demographics. So when the Saudi government says something, it means about as much to the average Saudi as it means to you when Trump says something.

Iran's goal is to cause revolutions in the GCC countries because the royal families are not super well liked by the normal people there...

We don't really know if this is gonna work out for them, but we also don't know that it won't...
that's a nice idea and all, but I don't think it's well thought out.

I don't think this is a "make a god bleed" scenario because the US was bloodied pretty substantially in Iraq and they didn't leave for a fucking forever, which works against "just do this one rash thing and you'll immediately win"

Replies

1
yes, and they're talking about buying greek islands and all kinds of dumb shit.

The thing to note is that just because they have insane plans it doesn't mean they work out.

The *critical* problem is that we already were bought into the Iran bullshit which none of these fucking gay boomer politicians will back away from.

Any fomenting they have done anywhere else, like Syria has been met with extremely limited support from the government and nothing at all from people. Turkey is going to be worse, and they're already in NATO to boot.