Nick Fuentes is calling himself a "moderate democrat" now. 110% chance he tells his viewers to vote for Kamala in 28.
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Replies
41
Completely out of context. He said that in 2026 he's going to vote like a moderate non-woke Democrat to stop Trump's war in Iran.
He said in 2028 he wants to vote for a dark horse candidate to destroy any political hopes of Vance or Rubio. If the 2028 nominee is Vance or Rubio, who gives a fuck if the nog bish wins?
He said in 2028 he wants to vote for a dark horse candidate to destroy any political hopes of Vance or Rubio. If the 2028 nominee is Vance or Rubio, who gives a fuck if the nog bish wins?
Vance or Rubio would be dramatically profoundly better than any democrat
context: he's a gay mexican being fed his lines by spooks because he was compromised over jan6
nothingburger
Profoundly disagree. Dying for Israel is bad and I don't want people who claim to politically align with me cheering that bullshit on.
Why? Cause he wasn't arrested for being where he was allowed to be, with a group of a dozen other people that didn't get arrested, cheering on the riot?
There are no spooks demanding Fuentes name the jew by name and question American jewish influence in our government. That's a silly assertion.
There are no spooks demanding Fuentes name the jew by name and question American jewish influence in our government. That's a silly assertion.
hes on video inciting others to go into the capital on a megaphone. this was played in Congress in January 21. extremely high profile. Others were busted for way less. the feds put him on the no fly list. they froze his bank accounts and stole his money. then they took him off and gave him his money back. why? if you can't see the answer idk what to tell you.
also yes I think the feds are pushing retard IQ antisemitism to discredit it. Tucker (cia family, "rejected" from cia, obvious mockingbird guy) is in on it too
also yes I think the feds are pushing retard IQ antisemitism to discredit it. Tucker (cia family, "rejected" from cia, obvious mockingbird guy) is in on it too
Because he has sex with men and his last name is Mexican.
>hes on video inciting others to go into the capital on a megaphone.
This isn't true and has been discussed literally a thousand times. He's on a megaphone 200 yards away, cheering them on while they did it. That's not "incitement".
No, others were not busted for way less. Most went into the capital or were in places that they were not allowed to be.
But feel free to show me different.
This isn't true and has been discussed literally a thousand times. He's on a megaphone 200 yards away, cheering them on while they did it. That's not "incitement".
No, others were not busted for way less. Most went into the capital or were in places that they were not allowed to be.
But feel free to show me different.
What man has claimed to have had sex with Fuentes?
I should take my own advice instead of giving it, but anyway:
Don't bother, some people on here are eternally buck broken by this guy and they will never listen to anything. It doesn't matter what anyone says, even Fuentes himself, they will just interpret everything however they want to arrive at their conclusion. There's a court document with pages and pages of Fuentes pleading the Fifth and these people use it as evidence that he snitched to the Feds.
Likewise with the Democrat thing. He's doing a bit and has explained his strategy at least two hundred times over the last few years but they don't want to understand, so they'll just talk nonsense
Don't bother, some people on here are eternally buck broken by this guy and they will never listen to anything. It doesn't matter what anyone says, even Fuentes himself, they will just interpret everything however they want to arrive at their conclusion. There's a court document with pages and pages of Fuentes pleading the Fifth and these people use it as evidence that he snitched to the Feds.
Likewise with the Democrat thing. He's doing a bit and has explained his strategy at least two hundred times over the last few years but they don't want to understand, so they'll just talk nonsense
I've seen the video man. I don't have it downloaded but he was basically saying "Go into the capital"
Fails the Brandenburg v Ohio "immenent lawless action" standard.
Fails the Brandenburg v Ohio "immenent lawless action" standard.
>Keep marching. Never relent. Break down the barriers, and disregard the police. The capitol is ours now.
This is about as clear-cut as it gets. His legal protection is suspicious because it's seemingly bottomless.
This is about as clear-cut as it gets. His legal protection is suspicious because it's seemingly bottomless.
"I hereby incite a riot. Break the law immenently right now en masse."
Learn what words means, ya illiterate homo.
I'll have you know I got a 36 on the reading comprehension section of the ACT (perfect score)
>Vance or Rubio would be dramatically profoundly better than any democrat
I'll have you know, this is totally fucking retarded, no matter what lies you tell about your testing. BTW, it wasn't the ACT, it was an IQ test.
I'll have you know, this is totally fucking retarded, no matter what lies you tell about your testing. BTW, it wasn't the ACT, it was an IQ test.
not an argument. are you latinx?
I don't argue with tards. It's called an "observation," Mr. 36.
there were barriers to the lawn, these are what he is talking about, these were already being overrun when he gave his speech. Situation got dicey after that video, he took everyone that he addressed and left with them.
Of those that stayed, not one person got arrested for being on the lawn only.
This has been public information for years at this point. you don't know what you are talking about.
The video with the framing you are using was spread by Milo Yiannopolous, who is an *actual* Mutt, Jew, Faggot, and FBI informant, so goes to show how well your radar is calibrated.
Of those that stayed, not one person got arrested for being on the lawn only.
This has been public information for years at this point. you don't know what you are talking about.
The video with the framing you are using was spread by Milo Yiannopolous, who is an *actual* Mutt, Jew, Faggot, and FBI informant, so goes to show how well your radar is calibrated.
that's a very generous reading of his words and obviously not the one the feds were using when the froze his bank accounts and put him on the no fly list
>this video of incitement without being investigated is proof he is a spook
>the feds investigating him is proof he is a spook
damned if you do, damned if you don't
you literally fell for Milo FUD.
>the feds investigating him is proof he is a spook
damned if you do, damned if you don't
you literally fell for Milo FUD.
nigga I've seen the video of him inciting a fucking riot at the most persecuted demonstration of my lifetime
There is literally nobody that got convicted for similar things to what Fuentes did. You can grandstand about muh persecution all you want. Even people who "rioted" meaning they DID tear down the lawn barriers (during/after that speech at the peace circle) did not get charged for that
are you latinx?
No, nigger, and if you weren't so fuckin' lazy at trollin' people, you'd already know that. Dumb fuckin' faggot.
well the only other reason youd be into Fuentes is you're gay
I never said that I was "into Fuentes." What I said was that you're an illiterate fuckin' retard, and you've now made my point, twice.
you are definitely into Fuentes as you're white knighting him for like 30 posts here and you said you watched his show enough to know he said since dumb cope like 50 times
>if you know the content you're gay
>Unlike me who receives all the information about him through a gay jewish informant who's had it out for Fuentes for years now
>Unlike me who receives all the information about him through a gay jewish informant who's had it out for Fuentes for years now
if you watch his show regularly you're "into" him. I watched it for a while around the 2020 election and through the stop the steal protests. At that time I was "into" the show
how come you're doing the lame "into him" and gay allegations then that'd mean you were gay at the time
his content was actually pretty good before the feds turned him and this was before the infamous blacklight cumhunt incident that removed all doubt about his sexual preferences
delusional
I explained the fed thing in this thread before. There is no evidence. You saw a maliciously out-of-context video, framed a different way, and believed it.
The cumhunter story is just retarded ass hearsay from some washed ex-colleague who tried to fuck him over, but of course you'd believe that too, you already want to believe. Anyone with 3 brain cells can see that it's just middle-school gossip.
The cumhunter story is just retarded ass hearsay from some washed ex-colleague who tried to fuck him over, but of course you'd believe that too, you already want to believe. Anyone with 3 brain cells can see that it's just middle-school gossip.
the context of the video was he was next to the capital on a megaphone during jan6. Idk what exactly you think the mitigating factors are because I'm not seeing them.
I forget the exact evidence of the cumhunt thing but I remember I considered it fairly damning at the time - especially in combination with the catboy date and the "sex with women is gay" comments.
I forget the exact evidence of the cumhunt thing but I remember I considered it fairly damning at the time - especially in combination with the catboy date and the "sex with women is gay" comments.
Of course you considered it damning. You're an idiot. You literally have no fucking idea what you're talking about and are simply parroting utter nonsense from kiwifarms that's been hashed out for years. You've clearly never watched his show.
Many things I may be, wrong among them, but I am not stupid. I'm muting you for being an abrasive asshole. Goodbye forever.
> he was next to the capital
outside capitol grounds
>mitigating factors
not inciting anything that wasn't already happening. For more, go ask the feds because again, NO ONE got charged for this, not just Fuentes.
outside capitol grounds
>mitigating factors
not inciting anything that wasn't already happening. For more, go ask the feds because again, NO ONE got charged for this, not just Fuentes.