Egregoros

He's downplaying the seriousness of the charge against israel: that discourse is shaped by a foreign government.

That is, the crop of people given a voice in the public square (rogan, shapiro, etc but not charlie kirk) is a kind of negative space consisting of people who happen to have survived the mossad filtration process. That the sphere of these "voices" also encompasses the political and judicial classes is not to be wondered at; of course it does. You don't get to be a trump on the global stage without a kushner to act as your puppeteer.

That the filtration happens is obvious. We can only speculate on how directly and how rigorously. This is much spookier than your kids' teachers being deranged shitlibs (not that that's an acceptable way to live, either.)

@BowsacNoodle I think Israel vs the Jews is another good example of this. Or being anti-Israel because it’s racist. Israel is a big bad and is very evil. At the same time, the enemies are thoroughly within the gates.
That said, people like Anna Kasparian demonstrate the left isn’t totally evil, and I know lots of good liberal-leaning people who not only wouldn’t put a bullet in my brain, but accept that I’m a chud and that’s alright.
I think it depends person to person on all of these issues. That is, different people are coping with different things for different reasons. There’s a lot politically going on rn.
Also, the Bolsheviks supported Israel until the 50’s, fwiw.

Bro, if it wasn't Mossad, it was the CIA or some other alphabet agency. He wasn't shot if the head with a gun, he was shot in the head with shrapnel propelled with a directional charge on his lapel mic. The reason why people say it's Israel is because they did something similar with pagers in the sandbox and killed a bunch of brown people with them so it's kind of something you can expect from Mossad. Also it appears that Charlie was getting critical of Israel, which is a big no no so the kikes definitely had motive. Believe what you want though. It really doesn't matter all that much. I'm sure you have other reason to believe kikes are evil and that is good enough. Obviously leftists are also evil because they listen to the worst shit produced by the kikes.

The thing is, sometimes you actually do need that argument. If I argue that X is irrational and stupid, you can very reasonably say "okay smart guy, how do you explain why so many people believe it?"

If I can't give you an answer, it means my mental model is incomplete which makes my argument unstable - I might be missing something important.

Example:
> Infant circumcision is medically useless and irrational because <supporting evidence>

> Okay but how do you explain why so many (non-religious) people still do it?

Bad answer: IDK they're dumb.

Good answer: Because it's easier to believe that the foreskin is some useless trash that needs to get cut off, than it is to believe that part of your dick is missing. So the psychological defense mechanism reenforces the practice.

>Jews destroy nations and enable the worst most corrosive elements from within and without
>"Have you considered that this tide of filth bent on destroying your own civilization while the cure is consistently kept suppressed and unable to organize is totally organic?"

False dichotomy, there is no binary choice, it is both.
In a sane society trannies wouldn't be anywhere but asylums and prisons and shallow graves instead of getting positions of influence.
Jews need their middle-management. Enter stage left, the Left.

Even if you don't have the smoking gun so to speak, these things are simple from a pure analytical PoV.

Who has the most to gain and the most to lose from these Happenings?

Charlie was groomed by Greater Israel to shill for them and keep the American right servile. He started going rogue, which was a real threat to what little influence the MIGAnigger lobby has with the youth, and it seems Charlie wasn't going to shut up, so they domed him.

Means, motive, timing and opportunity.

Insane Leftists shoot up churches and Christian schools. They're messy and unfocused, they're terrorists, they harass and terrorize their victims. They have the psyche of cowards, they prefer soft targets and less risky actions. They don't like the heat. It's why they lean towards safe-edgy activism and would never in a million years stand up for anything with any real risk to their comfort and safety. Opportunistic like a nigger. Not the best shots on Earth either. One apparent clean precise shot to the jugular? Naaaah. Precision shot or explosive device both have the hallmarks of Mossad. The training and callousness of a spooky-Jew. That sheer brazen bravado to just kill like that? Jewish. The well-poisoners. The knife in the dark to the back. Libshit cowardice and Jewish cowardice are two distinct phenomena from two distinct races.

The White shitlib is ALWAYS--as is common for our race--concerned about their social status. How they'll APPEAR to the rest of us. Shitliberalism is the result of over-socialization. Lone-wolfism is the hallmark of the Right wing male, not the Shitlib coper.

I'd sooner belief a bonafide National Socialist shot Kirk than a Lib.
And since that is unlikely for all sorts of reasons, the only real alternative is Jews. Jews don't care about appearing bad, wrong, they care about getting caught and triggering the goyim's reaction, but if they had their way they'd be openly able to abuse all of us as freely as they do Palestinians.

Either way the alleged shooter wouldn't have been up to it without constant grooming by glowkikes anyway so it's degrees of separation, not a decision on Jewish guilt.