Egregoros

Signal feed

Timeline

Post

Remote status

Context

22
@Xenophon @Humpleupagus @Dudebro @Electronwarrior @chanon He did admit to it and absolutely did turn himself in with his parents and family friend. The police interviewed Tyler, his parents, and the family friend that evening at the local county Sherrif's Office. Made video of it.​

The 30.06 (or, at the very least, a 30 caliber rifle firing a supersonic projectile) killed Charlie. There is video of Tyler going onto the roof, lying down, and firing the shot with the rifle that they recover in the woods where he is seen running into, with his DNA and prints all over that weapon. There was a hypersonic crack which means that the shot came from a rifle. If it wasn't Tyler's rifle, which rifle was it?

And Tyler's defense team didn't want to play the Twiggs interview for the courtroom or the media, because Twiggs and the Officer discuss, under oath, the several times Tyler admitted it, personally, in his own writing, and on several posts by text and discord.

The issue is that with a bullet with this much kinetic energy it would either punch through so fast it doesnt dump and of it, or it dumps all of it to stop in which case his neck would have visible exploded, at least internally, from the cavitation. You cant get around the physics. It is impossible to dumb 2200 ft/lbs of energy into a neck without seeing it.

@Xenophon @Humpleupagus @Dudebro @Electronwarrior @chanon @KingOfWhiteAmerica @rees Tyler confessed. Tylers boyfriend provided damning information. Tyler's parents believe he did it and said Tyler told them he did it and told the police about his sus behavior in the month prior. Tyler's family friend believes he did it and told the police he confessed. DNA and prints were collected at the scene and sent of to crimelab, the FBI, and the ATF. The prosecution is unknowingly prosecuting a patsy? And the defense is unknowingly defending a patsy? Why isn't the defense raising these questions that you have? The defense did very little to overcome the evidence.

All the people I listed would either be horrible at their job or were intentionally helping prosecute a known innocent patsy.
@Humpleupagus @Dudebro @Xenophon @Electronwarrior @chanon @KingOfWhiteAmerica @rees He confessed to Twiggs, in person, by handwritten note, and by text. He confessed to the family friend in person. He confessed to his parents, and they believed him. All of these people have given sworn statements. The parents and family friend were interviewed individually but separately. Twiggs was given working immunity (which is not complete immunity) for his statement. Then, Tyler confessed to his discord group. ​

And, if the defense raised enough doubt to leverage a plea bargain to get the death penalty off the table, he will plead guilty and give allocution, detailing exactly what he did in his own words.

Are all of these people lying? Was Tyler lying to all these people? Will you believe Tyler if he confesses to the court? You've disregarded every piece of evidence, you have no idea how you think he was killed. All you know is that a .3006 'can't possibly do that little amount of damage' and they paved over the crime scene 5 days later, so that means it was Israel, TPUSA, and a grand conspiracy involving the entire UT justice system, a dozen others, and a patsy willing to die to protect the scam. Right?
Also, it's not necessarily a "confession" if it doesn't corroborate the crime. A naked "I did it" can be prejudicial and excluded from evidence.

The reason is that "confessions" are an exception to the hearsay rule. Thus, if the only effect of the utterance is to make other evidence look more damming, rather than to show unique knowledge of the crime, etc, a good defense attorney will get it thrown out.