Tyler didnt admit to it or trn himself in. Thats why he has a good defense attorney. And a 30.06 cant do that little damage ever. So there's that.
Timeline
Post
Remote status
Context
13
@Xenophon @Humpleupagus @Dudebro @Electronwarrior @chanon He did admit to it and absolutely did turn himself in with his parents and family friend. The police interviewed Tyler, his parents, and the family friend that evening at the local county Sherrif's Office. Made video of it.
The 30.06 (or, at the very least, a 30 caliber rifle firing a supersonic projectile) killed Charlie. There is video of Tyler going onto the roof, lying down, and firing the shot with the rifle that they recover in the woods where he is seen running into, with his DNA and prints all over that weapon. There was a hypersonic crack which means that the shot came from a rifle. If it wasn't Tyler's rifle, which rifle was it?
And Tyler's defense team didn't want to play the Twiggs interview for the courtroom or the media, because Twiggs and the Officer discuss, under oath, the several times Tyler admitted it, personally, in his own writing, and on several posts by text and discord.
The 30.06 (or, at the very least, a 30 caliber rifle firing a supersonic projectile) killed Charlie. There is video of Tyler going onto the roof, lying down, and firing the shot with the rifle that they recover in the woods where he is seen running into, with his DNA and prints all over that weapon. There was a hypersonic crack which means that the shot came from a rifle. If it wasn't Tyler's rifle, which rifle was it?
And Tyler's defense team didn't want to play the Twiggs interview for the courtroom or the media, because Twiggs and the Officer discuss, under oath, the several times Tyler admitted it, personally, in his own writing, and on several posts by text and discord.
>The 30.06 (or, at the very least, a 30 caliber rifle firing a supersonic projectile) killed Charlie.
You habe no credibility after a statement like this. It isnt possible. I guess you buy the "bones of steel" theory.
You habe no credibility after a statement like this. It isnt possible. I guess you buy the "bones of steel" theory.
The issue is that with a bullet with this much kinetic energy it would either punch through so fast it doesnt dump and of it, or it dumps all of it to stop in which case his neck would have visible exploded, at least internally, from the cavitation. You cant get around the physics. It is impossible to dumb 2200 ft/lbs of energy into a neck without seeing it.
@Xenophon @Humpleupagus @Dudebro @Electronwarrior @chanon @FreeinTX I just looked at the account of the guy you are referencing and even he says it's a 30-06 corelokt but from the sorensen building not the losee building
No. He says it will through and through 6 inches. Nothing with that much force will be stopped by 6 inches of mostly empty space. Necks are not dense.
@rees @Xenophon @Humpleupagus @Dudebro @Electronwarrior @chanon @FreeinTX In my mind this looks a lot like making the facts to fit the model - not the model to fit the facts. But that’s just like my opinion, man 
He cant account for the physics of what a bullet would do in a neck. You have 2 choices. A clean through and through or a massive sudden energy dump. We have neither.
@Xenophon @Humpleupagus @Dudebro @Electronwarrior @chanon @FreeinTX @rees Yeah even with my proposed suggestion of a Rem .223 right into the jugular / carotid, we’re running up against that basic problem. It’s more reasonable than any .30-06, but it’s still got issues
They should have shot him with a rifle caliber that penetrated so at least we couldntake that argument. But we have to rely on the dr saying he had Wolverine bones.
@Xenophon @KingOfWhiteAmerica @Humpleupagus @Dudebro @Electronwarrior @chanon @rees They should have killed him in his sleep. Just give him a poison pill that his wife/handler could slip into his drink. Then, his wife and the coroner, whose obviously in on it, could give a simple story that no one would doubt.
Why when they can just say the tranny fucker did it and you believe them?
Replies
18
@Xenophon @Humpleupagus @Dudebro @Electronwarrior @chanon @KingOfWhiteAmerica @rees Because two people involved in a conspiracy is easier to accomplish than the entire justice system of a state and a hundreds other people involved in a conspiracy theory.
The fact you imagine everyone needs to be involved shows how silly you are. Why must they know? They believe presented facts as stupidly as you do.
@Xenophon @Humpleupagus @Dudebro @Electronwarrior @chanon @KingOfWhiteAmerica @rees Tyler confessed. Tylers boyfriend provided damning information. Tyler's parents believe he did it and said Tyler told them he did it and told the police about his sus behavior in the month prior. Tyler's family friend believes he did it and told the police he confessed. DNA and prints were collected at the scene and sent of to crimelab, the FBI, and the ATF. The prosecution is unknowingly prosecuting a patsy? And the defense is unknowingly defending a patsy? Why isn't the defense raising these questions that you have? The defense did very little to overcome the evidence.
All the people I listed would either be horrible at their job or were intentionally helping prosecute a known innocent patsy.
All the people I listed would either be horrible at their job or were intentionally helping prosecute a known innocent patsy.
Did he confess? Two which officer? Do you have proof it's a true confession?
@Humpleupagus @Dudebro @Xenophon @Electronwarrior @chanon @KingOfWhiteAmerica @rees He confessed to Twiggs, in person, by handwritten note, and by text. He confessed to the family friend in person. He confessed to his parents, and they believed him. All of these people have given sworn statements. The parents and family friend were interviewed individually but separately. Twiggs was given working immunity (which is not complete immunity) for his statement. Then, Tyler confessed to his discord group.
And, if the defense raised enough doubt to leverage a plea bargain to get the death penalty off the table, he will plead guilty and give allocution, detailing exactly what he did in his own words.
Are all of these people lying? Was Tyler lying to all these people? Will you believe Tyler if he confesses to the court? You've disregarded every piece of evidence, you have no idea how you think he was killed. All you know is that a .3006 'can't possibly do that little amount of damage' and they paved over the crime scene 5 days later, so that means it was Israel, TPUSA, and a grand conspiracy involving the entire UT justice system, a dozen others, and a patsy willing to die to protect the scam. Right?
And, if the defense raised enough doubt to leverage a plea bargain to get the death penalty off the table, he will plead guilty and give allocution, detailing exactly what he did in his own words.
Are all of these people lying? Was Tyler lying to all these people? Will you believe Tyler if he confesses to the court? You've disregarded every piece of evidence, you have no idea how you think he was killed. All you know is that a .3006 'can't possibly do that little amount of damage' and they paved over the crime scene 5 days later, so that means it was Israel, TPUSA, and a grand conspiracy involving the entire UT justice system, a dozen others, and a patsy willing to die to protect the scam. Right?
These are confessions given to officers, not fake and gay hearsay confessions. Youre being a fag and should stop it. Confessions are retard.
>BUT THE NAHTZEES CONFESSED AT NUREMBERG!!!!!!
>BUT THE NAHTZEES CONFESSED AT NUREMBERG!!!!!!
Also, it's not necessarily a "confession" if it doesn't corroborate the crime. A naked "I did it" can be prejudicial and excluded from evidence.
The reason is that "confessions" are an exception to the hearsay rule. Thus, if the only effect of the utterance is to make other evidence look more damming, rather than to show unique knowledge of the crime, etc, a good defense attorney will get it thrown out.
The reason is that "confessions" are an exception to the hearsay rule. Thus, if the only effect of the utterance is to make other evidence look more damming, rather than to show unique knowledge of the crime, etc, a good defense attorney will get it thrown out.
>i did it so we can be together
Lel.
Nigga walk me step by step through your entire fucking day and let me catch you on cctv.
Lel.
Nigga walk me step by step through your entire fucking day and let me catch you on cctv.
Exactly, and if you look at false confession cases, what usually occurs is that the "confession" corroborates the crime, but only because the police fed the suspect facts before getting the confession.
Surety bonds should be paying out over that shit.
Not a confession. But you keep thinking that.
@FreeinTX @Humpleupagus @Dudebro @Xenophon @Electronwarrior @chanon @KingOfWhiteAmerica @rees This last parapgraph is what is known as ''poisoning the well". That's some real big-nose shit right there.
@brimshae @FreeinTX @Humpleupagus @Dudebro @Xenophon @Electronwarrior @chanon @rees Yep; couldn’t possibly be reasonable skepticism toward the obvious lies of known liars - nope, we’re just unhinged schizos trying to save a damn tranny of all things 🤣
>Are all of these people lying?
Probably. Youd be amazed what people will do if you threaten them.
>Was Tyler lying to all these people?
Can you prove tyler actual made any of these confessions?
>Will you believe Tyler if he confesses to the court?
No, because again, youd be amazed what people will do when threatened. And saying you did something doesnt mean you did it as demonstrated above.
Probably. Youd be amazed what people will do if you threaten them.
>Was Tyler lying to all these people?
Can you prove tyler actual made any of these confessions?
>Will you believe Tyler if he confesses to the court?
No, because again, youd be amazed what people will do when threatened. And saying you did something doesnt mean you did it as demonstrated above.
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @brimshae @Humpleupagus @Dudebro @Xenophon @Electronwarrior @chanon @rees Are you saving a tranny or just trying to blame jews? With no evidence.
@brimshae @Humpleupagus @Dudebro @Xenophon @Electronwarrior @chanon @KingOfWhiteAmerica @rees No. It's really not. Yes. I said the "ATF" and "FBI" but I'm referring to specific people who testified under oath about what they, themselves, found. Specific people, who found evidence, themselves. The people actually testing the evidence. The Low IQ nog bish specifically said that "the governor of UT" and "Kash Patel" ordered the crimescene to be paved over. Doesn't that suggest that they are being accused of participating in the frame-up?
The people insisting that a lav mic exploded are suggesting that there was no rifle crack. The senior officer at UVU testified that there was. 2000 people heard it. Was he lying?
There would have to be lots of people in on framing this guy. Why not just kill Charlie in his own home, while he's there alone, and that same coroner that would have had to be in on it to plant the .3006 evidence, could have just as easily called a home death a shower slip and fall.
The people insisting that a lav mic exploded are suggesting that there was no rifle crack. The senior officer at UVU testified that there was. 2000 people heard it. Was he lying?
There would have to be lots of people in on framing this guy. Why not just kill Charlie in his own home, while he's there alone, and that same coroner that would have had to be in on it to plant the .3006 evidence, could have just as easily called a home death a shower slip and fall.
@FreeinTX @Xenophon @Humpleupagus @Dudebro @Electronwarrior @chanon @KingOfWhiteAmerica @rees You've convinced me