Egregoros

Is there actually any Linux distro that isn't governed by retards that want to keep breaking things?

Yeah, we will just drop this very popular package in a month, because we are autistic about dropping Qt5 and are removing packages using it.
image.png

@phnt GNU Linux-libre

@Suiseiseki
>GNUslop Linux-Libre
>not governed by retards
You clearly didn't read my post

@phnt @Suiseiseki if you think gnu is slop, then you shouldn't have ever so much as considered a gnu - hurd + linux distribution viable in the first place, since they all use a slop shell, a slop libc implementation, slop core utilities, a slop c compiler, a slop build system, and dozens upon dozens, if not hundreds, of other slop programs all under a slop license.

@HatkeshiatorTND @Suiseiseki Correct, that's why I'm never using more of that slop than absolutely necessary. The perfect Linux system is one without GNU.

@phnt @Suiseiseki that can't exist, because linux itself is distributed under the gnu general public license (version 2.0-only)

@HatkeshiatorTND @phnt *Partially distributed.

I can envision a future where Linux is 100% proprietary software - we're already 51% there.

Whats the difference? do you not believe in a one drop rule?

@monkyyy @HatkeshiatorTND @phnt One drop of proprietary software is easy to excise - you just delete it and write the 5 line free software replacement and the problem is solved permanently.

Although there is a serious problem when >50% of the program is proprietary software.

Its nice your getting more moderate

@monkyyy @HatkeshiatorTND @phnt I've never been more extreme.

@Suiseiseki @HatkeshiatorTND @phnt @monkyyy shut up your not helping anybody dude. Fuck free software,fuck gnu and fuck your hero Richard stallmen also fsf.